Is it written like this in the Taoist book, but this sentence made me deeply feel Qiong Yao's demeanor and the famous sentence "You just lost a pair of legs, and Ziling lost her love!", This kind of wishful thinking and brain-damaged thinking is really ridiculous. Since it is irresponsible, do it to the end. Don't expect your son to forgive you. Your son may not understand why you abandon your husband and abandon your son. Because of love, he may not understand you. All I can say is that you don't understand what it's like to have such an irresponsible mother. If Sophie's Anna is pure in the end, then Keira's version is not only crazy, but also crazy, laughing like a pre-cracked neurotic from time to time (of course, it may also be the reason why Keira is stupid when she laughs) ), from time to time, it seems to be yin and yang weird and vitriolic, and the characters that were originally unpleasant have been adapted to make people intoxicated. I don’t listen to persuasion to play shamelessly in public places, and I can’t bear to come back after being treated coldly. I also blame others for not persuading her. , Anna has never been the type of woman I like. You can say that she is a brave pursuit of love, but after she really did something like this, she couldn't bear it, couldn't bear the scorn of others, couldn't bear to see her son, you Why did you go early? If you want to pursue it, pursue it to the end. If the fish die and the net is broken, you will be less happy. You dare to do it and dare not bear the resentment. Implicit, the heroine is at least more serene. The new version not only makes her and the hero have a child, but also makes the heroine look innocent, silly, crazy, gorgeous like a shooting technique, and stripped her off on the stage. Let's watch it Thoroughness makes me suspect that the director dislikes the role of Anna very much, and is determined to shape her in a direction that is both respectful and upright, so that everyone will not hate her, as if she is unwilling, and the existence of Anna and the male lead and children makes her even more Her irresponsible selfish image is even better, the old version also abandoned one child, and the new version abandoned two, making the audience feel that this Anna is really pure and pure living in her own world, only thinking about her own freedom Happiness, if the old version is just a work, then the new version is not only a work, but also crazy and a bitch.
The new version of Voronsky is even less Russian than the old version. His eyebrows and eyes are more beautiful and richer than the heroine, and even his beard can't stop his thick and greasy little white face. It is the frivolous and romantic look in the eyes, which is the sense of sight, and I have to suspect that the director is actually a male and female lead. One is more swaying than the other, and the other is more frivolous. Warrensky acted like a veteran in love, showing affection to everyone, so that the first half did not see the slightest so-called true love, but there was a kind of passion. The visual sense, the first half is not serious, and the second half is divided in various ways, sometimes it seems irresponsible and selfish, such as the heroine in the heroine's house that he wants to take care of his reputation, and the heroine in the theater tears. Twinkle expects the male protagonist to save the game and the male protagonist stands still, but sometimes he looks very affectionate, and the whole second half is spent in splits, making the audience sometimes lament that he is sincere, really a good man, and sometimes sigh What a thing, I really didn't take responsibility, but it was enough. The last scene appeared in Anna's brain supplement as the image of a scumbag who didn't know if it was true or not, and formed with the old version of the hero who wanted to die as a soldier. Strong contrast, it is difficult not to make people suspect that the director is black. As for Karenin, I have to say that he is a tragic character. I don’t know what it is like in the book. Karenin is a person who attaches great importance to honor and is unsmiling and overly serious, but both versions show that he has love for Anna. There was nothing wrong with the previous version. It can only be said that it is boring and dull, and the new version is even more pitiful. It's a little more human. Of course, both versions are suffocating enough. They endured the entry of his wife's lover into the house. The new version is even more pitiful. He even made an illegitimate child. He has to forgive his wife and give her and the illegitimate child a reputation. Of course, we are not here. Discuss which version is more pitiful. The softening portrayal of the husband in the new version makes the male and female protagonists even darker, not to mention that she has to help her raise her daughter in the end. Who knows where Voronsky went, anyway, the director's purpose must be achieved. And the consequences are obvious. If there are still some romantic and free people in the old version who will raise their arms and shout to let Anna and Voronsky be together, let them go, let them be free, then the series of performances in the new version will only Shout out, let Mr. Karenin go, let him be free, he is innocent.
The other roles are relatively weak, but Lev's actors are really not like Russians, and Princess Kitty is not as beautiful and girly as the old version. Several scenes in the old version make people think that she is an innocent and shy girl. The new version may be because of her style. The reason is that the first paragraph is a little silly, but it is more attentive in terms of shaping. Of course, the new version of Lev and Kitty seem to be deliberately shaped by the director to deliberately eliminate the male and female protagonists. Kitty is not afraid of hardships and tiredness. In the end, the joy of their family even gave the male and female protagonists a slap in the face, because they were more like spiritual love and fit than the male and female protagonists, and the male and female protagonists were like a momentary dizzy pair of demons, the contrast is so tragic , the director's heart can be punished wow!
From the film's winning the best cinematography, I can see the advantages of this film. I remember that the costume style of the year also won awards, but this stage play style is really unbearable throughout, even the performance of the actors feels It also carries the exaggeration and gorgeousness of the stage play, which makes people feel embarrassed sometimes. The director used extremely gorgeous scenes and exquisite photography editing to blacken the male and female protagonists. Although the set board is gorgeous and a little distorted, the exterior scenes make it easier for people to play. Going to the UK is like a macaron with too much sugar, which is greasy and choking. The director put all these on one stage, which really makes people feel like a satirical farce. The director's goal must be to achieve Now, the people on stage are lunatics, but the people offstage are not fools.
View more about Anna Karenina reviews
