The characterization of the film is not full enough, and the priority between the characters seems ambiguous. Saul is a well-deserved protagonist. The purpose of this adventure is to confirm his scientific thesis. This is a persistent step he took for the sake of faith. But what position do the other people occupy in the story? The director did not clarify. I think the story is composed of a main character, a sub-main character—the engineer who bought the refrigerator—and several brother-like sub-characters, and this structure is unstable. "The Way Back" is much better than it. As a professional film critic said, Saul represents "the courage of human beings to chase the unknown", and "the entangled raft should be bound with ropes (in fact, wires) instead of twine." The engineer selling refrigerators represents "rationality." . But I think both of them are actually rational, because they both believe in science. But Saul is an idealist, and the engineer is a realist. The extraordinary thing about Saul is that he is a scientist full of idealism. This idealism is reflected in his stubbornness and perseverance. He firmly believes that his theory is correct. In order to prove his theory, he set foot on it. Crazy expedition road. The engineer is down to earth like a scene among this group of people, but Sol himself is actually the most down-to-earth person, because he took scientific research out of the dusty library, "Just sit at the desk or hold a seminar. There is no way to complete this scientific research", this sentence is really good.
Full text source address: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_5d608ce201019wmi.html
View more about Kon-Tiki reviews
