The missile was finally fired. The little African girl who didn't know it from the beginning to the end still had life characteristics under the aftermath of the first missile, but she finally died after the second missile was launched to kill the "terrorist".
At the end of the film, the scene of the little girl playing the hula hoops innocently "before her death" is played again and again, as if asking over and over again: Do politicians thousands of miles away have the right to decide her life and death? Is it possible to implement a battle plan that uses the death of a little girl as an additional damage value, thereby saving many potential civilians who may be killed by "human bombs"? Is this morally and legally tenable?
The last words of the general who has been advocating launch are representative: "As a man in the office drinking coffee and eating biscuits, never ask a soldier what the price of war is".
View more about Eye in the Sky reviews
