The production is very grand, the guests are very heavyweight, and there is no problem with the basic point of view, but in order to guide the point of view, editing methods are used, and various explicit hints are used to highlight the stammering and angry side of the "negative" guests, which makes people feel that they lose their objectivity. sex. But after all, a film of more than 100 minutes has to accommodate the interviews of so many guests and to refine the viewpoints. It is bound to not be able to conduct in-depth exploration and discussion like ordinary talk shows. In fact, I feel more and more that the words of current affairs interviewers are too powerful, and the guests who refuse to interview are actually very wise. This kind of film has already set the tone and cannot show the whole point of view, and the interview can only reveal the ugly side. Even some guests may refuse to be interviewed simply because they are not available or not interested, but in the way of presentation of the film, they seem to be guilty of a guilty conscience.
On the other hand, the older I get, the more I understand the world, and the more I realize the class separation between the high-ranking people and the ordinary people in this world. It may be human nature to be unprofitable, but a little bit of evil from the superior may be able to stir up the whole world. And we ordinary people are just fish on the chopping board and ants in the soil.
View more about Inside Job reviews
