View more about Solace reviews
Charles' fate
Zion 2022-04-19 09:02:23
After watching the film, there is one thing I don't understand. Why did Charles take John forward step by step, why did he choose to meet John at the bar, why did he explain his motive for killing, doing so would only expose himself, what's the point of doing this? , and he knew that John would also be there before he was going to kill the man who was about to suffer from fibrous spine cancer. Charles' ability was stronger than John's. Before that, John and the FBI didn't find any clues about Charles. Why did he want to? to do so? On the train, Charles said that he would find someone to inherit him. This person should be as predictable as himself. He also said that John was about to kill him. I guess Charles himself also predicted that he would be seriously ill. He came with his own ideas. It is speculated by the public, and John chose to euthanize his daughter, so Charles wanted John to end his life, but John himself would not do it, so he arranged for the female detective to get on the bus. He did not want to kill John, but It was shooting at the female detective, and John shot and killed Charles in order to protect the female detective. This is Charles' understanding of life, helping people relieve pain, but everyone's understanding of life is different, just like Joe after learning that he has cancer, thinking about spending more time with his family, this is Joe's understanding of life I understand that he cherishes life and time more. Charles did this to relieve Joe's pain in advance, and also allowed his family to get pensions. He did it right or wrong. John did not agree or deny what he did. He himself It is also in contradiction. The sentence at the end of the film: I will see you again, leave room for the audience to imagine, see how Old John will make a choice, and whether Charles' fate will be ended. Personal opinion is that others have no right to take away everyone's life, even if he is in pain, just like the fate of Charles, everyone has the pain and pleasure he has to go through, has his fate, as bystanders we have no It is necessary to have the right to intervene and show your own kind heart to ease the pain of others.
Extended Reading
-
Isom 2021-12-27 08:01:12
#通灵神探# This is a mediocre movie that makes people too lazy to evaluate. A director without a resume is obviously unable to control the overall situation, so that at the end of the film, the movie is completely out of control, and the audience is completely mad when they are confused. There are many elements integrated in this film, but none of them can cheer up people. I want to fold them up and say good things, but find that none of them are flattering. Anthony Hopkins has been unable to beat his spirits, and the audience has to fall asleep. 6 points
-
Antonetta 2022-03-29 09:01:04
A parody of the Seven Deadly Sins, without the old man's acting skills, nothing would be left of the show. When I watched it, I kept thinking, how did Colin Farrell get into such a mess?
-
[first lines]
Joe Merriwether: [sniffing the cigar] Cuban.
Agent Katherine Cowles: What's the word, Sawyer?
Agent Sawyer: Looks like a match.
Agent Katherine Cowles: [holds up three fingers to Merriwether]
Agent Sawyer: [on the phone] Yeah, it's Joe. We've got a series. Same M O, same signature, no DNA. Not one goddamn shred.
-
Agent Katherine Cowles: Dr. Clancy, before we go upstairs, with all due respect, I don't hold an ounce of confidence in the paranormal in general. I think it's a sham. I hope that's okay.
John Clancy: No problem at all. I feel the same about shrinks. After only one thing, your money. Give them your little finger, they'll take your whole hand.
Agent Katherine Cowles: Whoever said that has obviously never met a good one.
John Clancy: It was Sigmund Freud.