This is a typical incident about a fierce conflict between professional ethics and other interests.
I don’t think it is necessary to criticize the government’s actions in the film.
This is a choice that both parties have to make from their own perspectives. The
government insists It should be treated in the same way as Rachel's insistence,
but Rachel's greatness lies in the fact that - one -
I am convinced by her enormous pressure,
in the case of personal infringement, I
can still protect the interests of the industry and adhere to professional ethics~
But I have my personal opinion on the plot.
It tells a mostly true story.
The added fictional plot of the female agent being shot and killed is very shocking,
but as the end,
it is a bit superfluous to use the little girl as a sourcer.
If you want to tell the truth,
That itself is not necessary,
except for the people in the play, I don't think anyone cares about Rachel's source.
If you want to protect the little girl as the reason for Rachel's insistence,
then I don't think even the movie itself agrees with the protagonist's insistence on professional ethics,
or think that only professional ethics should not make people so great?
This no-blank ending takes the theme a little off.
If you put the ending in the sunset, Rachel watched her ex-husband leave with her son~
View more about Nothing But the Truth reviews
