7.0 I have heard of Ernst Liu Bieqian for a long time, but I still dare not open it like the envelope of the year-end award. This analogy is really good. I have talked about it many times, the view on love: the coolest thing is that you can never get in, and at the same time you don't know that you can never get in, and secondly, you are waiting to get in right away. Its joke lies not only in the stupid heroine and the cowardly heroine, but also in the power of ridicule, even if they think they are telling the truth, they are still hypocritical. "For a loved one, nothing is more dangerous and deadly than being loved. We misidentify or misidentify him or her. That is why after we discover that we are wrong, love quickly turns into violence. Only when this Only when a person meets our phantom coordinates can we accept him or her. Many times when we fall in love with someone, we do not accept him or her as they are." The letter was stolen from Hugo, and this paragraph The words are copied from Zizek.
Even though this is a light comedy, I still don't understand it, no doubt; even if there are thousands of dialogues, many meanings are still unspoken. This is the 1940s, so Samson Reverson deserves more credit. To sum up the outstanding points of this book, two words, one is strategy, and the other is the universality of ordinary people. The best part of the plot itself is that he is not afraid to detour when solving problems. Cleric can reveal his identity at any time, but he has to solve the problem before revealing it. He has to prosecute himself by intercepting Hugo verses. Shaping the image. It is not easy for the creator to be so patient in genre films. Even with such patience, this harmonious ending still seems too fast. After all, at Christmas, it makes sense to enjoy joy regardless of the reason. The second half of everyone's joy is also normal as a New Year's Day file. Liu Bieqian said that "American audiences only have the mind of twelve-year-old children", but I really can't help but start to fantasize about a more incorrect version. Of course, as an audience, whether you look at Alfred Klerik or Hugo Matusjok or Ferenc Vadas or Pepi Katona or Rudy, you can make up the icing. The cruel truth below has both bad parts and stupid parts. Liu Bieqian may not want to add this cruel, inferiority and narcissistic character attack to Claire Novak, or he may have said to many feminist researchers that such character design is a kind of female image discipline. , It may even be derived from what he said, "the American audience only has the mind of twelve-year-old children"-no matter what, I have conceived that an outright sex-transformed version may be more fun, remember the book she shared," Treat him like a dog first." Will the change really be great? It will be more real and more painful with me.
View more about The Shop Around the Corner reviews
