Feeling dreaming

Eunice 2022-01-13 08:04:18

Regardless of whether the resource system constructed by project venus is called a technological utopia or an anarchist technological garden of Eden, it takes a very bold idea to start from the problem. countless times).

It has always been considered that the greatest invention of mankind in the 20th century is the Internet, and the gradual symmetry of information exchange has promoted the forced improvement of the rules of the game. The technology has only lifted its feet a few steps, and the impact of which has benefited the flat-headed people does not need to be repeated. This is the prerequisite for him to affirm his plan.

In addition, Project Venus denies the existence and functions of civil organizations, consortiums, companies, and polities, unless they can deal with social ailments and help the poor and the weak without attracting money.

(Although I consciously mentioned that this concept is not perfect, if there is a monopoly of technological resources such as selling patents, this problem may exist in the early days of technological utopia. Not everyone is looking forward to an equal and plain materialistic life, but the film is still relatively far-fetched. The evil of human nature is attributed to a simple affirmation of acquired nature, and to cultivate an overwhelming majority of wiseman society, it is also very challenging the existing education system, so the circle comes back again, or a country with highly developed national concepts and qualities Willing to adopt this plan to take the lead out of a dualistic regime that is not both right and left (should be a plan for science and technology to serve mankind) and enter the fourth wave in advance.) The

most important thing is the way of thinking of the plan: if we are used to living in In a gold-only social system, it is as familiar as breathing air to be educated, to work, to marry and give birth, and to become parents. Finally, at the moment of detachment, I firmly believe that this is what we should walk through. All of the standard procedures of life-overtime, exhaustion from waking up in the morning, and emptiness after material consumption-are all normal. Indeed, a certain bookstore economics textbook says: "Happiness does not belong to the scope of capitalism. "The last sentence is understood very well from the workers on the esemble ine to the hawkers in the gray area.

So is the answer to the question really so desperate? Are people destined to live in this system as soon as they are born? It seems that "in the womb" is not sung to nirvana fans alone, everyone has a share. I remember Hayek said that there are only demons and demons in this world, and the only difference is which one is more evil.

So like Alexander used to fight the sword, the project wanted to cut off this bell knot. I admire its bold strategy, even if it has flaws in self-identification.

The baby's first thought was whether it was an angel or another Miphiste Felix. DNA verification will take some time, but applauded for this feeling, even if it doesn't.

View more about Zeitgeist: Addendum reviews

Extended Reading
  • Cassandra 2022-04-23 07:03:48

    The first half is good and instructive. Worth a look. But in the second half, it was simply missionaries preaching. The Venus plan is not only stupid and naive, but also the way of publicity is disgusting. So, just look at the first half.

  • Lela 2022-03-25 09:01:18

    The former arrogant, the latter a fool, still has the effect of refreshing the understanding

Zeitgeist: Addendum quotes

  • Narrator: It is important to point out that regardless of the social system - whether fascist, socialist, capitalist, or communist - the underlying mechanism is still money, labor, and competition. Communist China is no less capitalistic than the United States. The only difference is the degree by which the state intervenes in enterprise. The reality is that "Monetary-ism", so to speak, is the true mechanism that guides the interest of *all* the countries on the planet.

  • [last lines]

    Jiddu Krishnamurti: What we are trying in all these discussions and talks here, is to see if we cannot radically bring about a transformation of the mind. *Not accept things as they are* - but to understand it, to go into it, examine it, give your heart and your mind with every thing that you have to find out. A way of living differently. But that depends on you and not somebody else. Because in this there is no teacher, no pupil. There's no leader, there is no guru, there's no master, no savior. You yourself are the teacher, and the pupil, you're the master, you're the guru, you are the leader, you are everything! And, to understand is to transform what is.