Generally speaking, the plot is stable and true. Two opposing men who have no choice but to choose their camps sit in a teahouse in Lahore and chat. Although there is a nervous atmosphere, each other knows that the other party is not an extremist. They all hope to resolve the contradictions between nations, but each has its own difficulties.
As the selves of both parties, there are good reasons to tell us why they chose this path, everyone has their own story, and everyone has their own grievances, I can understand. What I want to focus on is the prevalence of national or regional discrimination in the human sphere. To give a simple example, people think that the Russians are rude, the French are romantic, the British gentlemen, the Americans are open, the Chinese are hardworking, and the Japanese are respectful... Maybe you would say, that's it? Let me ask the question: Does it mean that the Chinese are hardworking, and there is no one around you who is lazy, or even idle. I think the answer is no, so the same rhetorical question is: If Muslims are militant, none of them is peace-loving? The answer is also no. Human nature loves peace. Who would like to live under the shroud of bullets and bullets every day, without a fixed place, life or death, besides, we still have our favorite parents, wives, and children. The reason for embarking on the road of fighting was the provocation of some extremists, which caused the innocent and easy to follow the masses to mistake the "truth" proclaimed by them; secondly, it is best to solve some internal problems by themselves as much as possible. However, there are people who are nosy, in the name of protecting peace, but are killing on the territory of a country. What kind of protection is this? Of course, there are many other reasons, not to list them all.
Mr. Khan, a terrorist who was misunderstood as a radical, is equally understandable. Because of their own ethnic issues, people will naturally stay away from people with beards after 9/11. However, he is also innocent. What people with similar or similar cultural backgrounds do does not mean that she is like that. We can't distinguish people as one category, but one by one. All are independent, all are individual. A person from the UK may be a drunk with no culture, while a person from China may have nothing to do, and a person from France may be full of swear words. Why is it impossible?
What we need to do is to understand the commonality of individuals.
It may be really difficult, just as when the last two people were talking about what seemed to be harmonious, because a coincidence action made each other deeply mistrusted, and what we need is trust.
Communication can eliminate prejudice, however, prejudice everywhere.
View more about The Reluctant Fundamentalist reviews
