I appreciate that intellectuals stem from the appreciation of their moral consciousness, truth-seeking nature, and social responsibility. Therefore, I agree with people's view that publicity and criticality are the attributes of intellectuals. Publicity means that intellectuals regard social and political issues as moral issues and hold a sense of obligation. They regard public interest incidents as personal responsibility to care about, while criticality is used as a means of execution to express their public interest. Sexual spiritual personality, this way of expression has universal significance for intellectuals. Therefore, some people often regard intellectuals as opponents who maintain dissent and have reverse thinking, especially the opposition of the regime. This kind of thinking is also easy to understand: in the public domain where there are still shortcomings in the pursuit of freedom, justice, and constitutional value, the shortcoming means the existence of shortcomings, including deceit and lies, and the government is the main manipulator of the public domain, intellectuals Asking questions out of the truth-seeking nature, naturally stood in a political confrontational position. Of course, in a society with a more complete free, democratic and legal system, I personally hope that the public spiritual personality can surpass the critical means of expression, but I have to admit that the critics must exist.
However, in an immature democratic society, the price that intellectuals pay for critical behavior becomes more frightening. The more immature a democratic society is, the more critical the power of intellectuals is needed. This contradiction has caused a change in the definition of intellectuals in today's society. Intellectuals are regarded as knowledge practitioners or senior brain workers. However, as far as the original nature of intellectuals is concerned, those who are limited to the generation of professional fields, dissemination and creation of knowledge, do not reflect the "publicity" that transcends professional fields, just as Zola, as a writer, intervened in the injustice of legal proceedings. From this perspective, the intellectuals defined by the masses nowadays, as the so-called professors say, they only have a career but no ambitions. Therefore, even those with high-level knowledge are not intellectuals of the national backbone. In other words, they lack the qualities and attributes of intellectuals.
It is against this background that intellectuals have gradually become marginalized. Some people who break away from the marginalized and move toward the center of society are accompanied by a shift in attention. Let’s not talk about the exquisite culture of Xiaotiandi, or the fun and enjoyment of worldly life. The problem is that materialism somewhat dissolves the social conscience of intellectuals. This shift and dissolution makes people less passionate about social issues. If you are enjoying materialism The era of doctrine has been slow to answer some of the spiritual propositions of this era, so this generation is negligent and sad.
——By Carol
View more about The Life of Emile Zola reviews
