Regarding the advantages.
The plot is compact, and the interspersed subtlety is amazing. As the whole movie progresses, the continuous quips and ups and downs of development are like reading a quotation from a historian. The huge historical background is revealed along with the continuous combing of the relationship between the characters. It is really amazing. .
Helen is really old drama, her gestures and gestures are full of charm, especially the speech of visiting the army on the eve of the naval battle is extremely shocking, that is the queen's demeanor. However, it was precisely her overly strong presence that concealed Elizabeth herself to a certain extent.
First of all, the supporting role was vilified to contrast with her.
Marie Stuart is one of them. Although the claim that the French court is crowned is political, there is no doubt that Marie’s appearance is better than Elizabeth. Although she was detained for 19 years, she was deprived of it in the last few years. The right to exercise and arthritis began to gain weight. Mary should still be a half-old milf, not a bloated and obtuse Obasan. You must know that Babington was a young man in 1585. I still admire her before and after, how can I find such an ugly actor, compared to Helen's wrinkled face is much more comfortable. In addition, Elizabeth Wannian insisted on dieting, and she had a slender figure, but Helen obviously didn't show this. At the beginning, she couldn't see her waist when she was undressing.
Robert Cecil is the second. As the son of Burleigh and Mild, he should not have such a wretched temperament even if he was born disabled and lame. Robert's portrait is historical, with a thin face and deep eyes. Looking for such an actor is nothing but Cecil. The old enemy of Essex, this pair from father to son, little Cecil did not need to be the victim of the handsome little Essex because he had no scandal with the queen and no protagonist’s future. In his dealings with James I, he is the dominant position, this movie is too interpretation.
Secondly, many plots are fictitious to portray Elizabeth's growth.
The marriage of Leicester and the shameless Norris Elizabeth knew right away. There was no need to be so excited and gloomy when she was maliciously exposed by the French ambassador. Elizabeth was already well-known in Europe when Mary fell in Scotland. She is a successful actor, covering her emotions is a piece of cake for her. She can fight Essex, who is secretly married, but she will never lose her ugliness in front of foreigners.
Elizabeth was not by his side when Leicester died, and the affectionate farewell was pure and vain, let alone handing over the stepson to Elizabeth. Such a fictional fiction is more like a trick of some ancient TV dramas in our country. In addition to that speech after Leicester’s death, oh my god, it was adapted from golden speech. It was the last public speech before Elizabeth’s death. It was more than ten years away from Leicester’s death and mentioned the prince. That paragraph is not to say that it regrets that Britain has lost an Earl of Leicester who should have become a great king, but that she herself loves England and has a clear conscience for her job. Elizabeth has never let go of the position of the king. It is impossible to praise Leicester so lightly. The change here is really inexplicable. It seems to express the queen's affection and righteousness, but it is a pity that the queen only needs and can only be kind and righteous to the country.
Elizabeth never met Mary. The two of them are like cousins who grew up together. They are always compared with each other. For a woman, this is enough to make her feel disgusted with each other. Not to mention that the first half of Elizabeth's life is not as smooth as Mary, and the marriage is not as happy as Mary. Not as popular as Mary, this is a subtle and fatal stimulus for women. If Elizabeth had any concern and partiality for Mary's life, it was the majesty of her monarch. You must know that Worthingham and Burley are both new nobles. They pointed directly at Mary so sharply and hoped to kill her easily. At the same time, they were playing with Elizabeth's scaly. She was also the queen. The rabbit and the fox must have a heart of grief, but she I also understand that Mary’s existence is a threat. Even if it is not a threat, Mary’s potential status as "heir to the throne of England" also loses part of Elizabeth's loyalty, which is unbearable for women. The two women have been making false claims to each other. The tacit understanding of acting together can be seen in the correspondence of those sour and dead. They have no affection, only political checks and balances, but when they meet, it is like breaking the window paper, and Elizabeth no longer stands there. "I am ignorant, so I am innocent" advantage, so she will not go to see this cousin even if she is dead.
The interaction between Elizabeth and Leicester obliterated the dignity of the earl as a man. Although speaking of dignity, the earl hasn't been enough to pat his wife on the shoulder and the queen said that if you don't marry me, some people are willing to marry, but it is not as useless as in the movie. After the private marriage incident was exposed, he returned to the court because Elizabeth couldn’t make it. The two people struggled for so many years. She also understood that marriage would not have any significant impact on their relationship. Letis was just the second Amy. , But it is really the great "friendship between men and women who transcend love" that catalyzes this change? It is an eternal relationship of interest. Leicester needs a solid political position, and Elizabeth needs to check and balance Burley and Worthingham. This is the bottom line that they are unwilling to say. In addition, Lester never admits his military mistakes in the Netherlands. He claims that everything he has is for loyalty to the Queen and therefore has a clear conscience. He will definitely not bow down to Elizabeth as a pseudonymous woman like in the movie. You are always right". If Elizabeth had loved anyone in her life, it was only Leicester, and as a king, she would not fall in love with a pseudo-mother who had no opinion.
Elizabeth did direct an inferior play when she signed the paperwork for Mary's execution. She herself gave the signed letter to Davis but said that the order could not be given to Burley without her own notice. What is Davis? Could he hide this order himself? He is just a messenger, and the queen can't easily explain that he is so ambiguous. In fact, Davis seems to have received some kind of "care", more likely from the Queen's Ascaris Burleigh, because he was convicted of "capital crime" and was put in the Tower of London, and was released after the limelight passed, and even received a pension. The occurrence of this incident has eliminated the possibility of Elizabeth feeling the pain of family feelings about Mary’s death. What she pains is that she personally subverted her absolute authority as a monarch, and what is even more painful is how to deal with Mary’s death. The troubles at home and abroad.
Also, Essex rushed back from Ireland and broke into the Wushuang Palace to meet Elizabeth, who was facing the sky. Elizabeth was sixty-seven years old in 1600. A sixty-seven-year-old woman with no makeup and no concealment, even if she was a queen, her breasts would shrink and droop and her face would be criss-crossed with sparse hair, which means that the queen at this time cannot be seen. The sharp contrast between him and her at this time in the declining age is a very strong medicine for women. Everything is torn apart. Face reality, his exaggerated admiration and her coquettish ostentation have become A naked joke, so she cannot forgive Essex like Lester, even if the former caused direct losses in English trade interests and unfavorable preparations for the Western War, while the latter never threatened her Wang Quan’s safety, even though The latter secretly communicated with James VI to discuss succession matters, while the former even wrote to Mary Stuart to show his loyalty. Here, Helen's appearance can be described as dignified and pleasant, without any unprepared panic.
This film succeeded in creating a dignified, wise, powerful, and affectionate "Queen of Helen" based on Elizabeth, and that was not Elizabeth.
View more about Elizabeth I reviews
