Henry Fonda never said that he thinks the juvenile is innocent. He has always emphasized that he is making "reasonable suspicions."
When the remaining three jury members believed that the teenager was guilty, he said: “I really don’t know what the truth is. I don’t think anyone knows the truth. The nine of us now think that the defendant is innocent, but we are Gamble on a possibility, maybe we are wrong, maybe we will let go of a murderer, I don’t know, and no one can know for sure. But we have reasonable suspicion that it is a very precious part of our judicial system. Unless it is very precious Sure, the jury cannot convict the defendant.”
Regarding the judicial system, I don’t know exactly where the US and China are different, but this movie took a lot of effort to explain to us the rationality of “reasonable suspicion”. Although I used to watch some film and television dramas on the subject of law and politics, I felt like some bad guys were let go because of this system, but the "Twelve Angry Men" made me change my view. I feel that "reasonable suspicion" is indeed a matter of great respect. Human rights system: You cannot easily judge a person's guilt or innocence, and don't let go of even one percent of the possibility of suspicion-I really appreciate this pragmatic attitude and consider it a kind of responsibility.
View more about 12 Angry Men reviews
