The three men are good, bad and villain. The character setting is very simple, just play the subtitles with you directly, and even save your time to think about the characters, but it is just as attractive! The three people revolved around the story of a windfall. The setting is indeed very appetizing. The reason why this film is great is not only the plot and characters, but also its background. Therefore, the difference between the ordinary and the great is that there is a humanitarian and humanistic stand beside the story. This is an essential element for all excellent literary works. What attracts the most people in this movie is the audience's attention to the fate of three different characters. This is where the audience's interest lies. The final ending did satisfy the audience's wishes. My favorite character is the villain. This is an almost comic character. There is something about him that makes you want to laugh. He is cunning, fierce, and rascal. But these are not facial makeup, but through his actions, words, and expressions. You can also understand his helplessness. He was born in troubled times. He would rather tell me to bear the people of the world than to let the people of the world bear my philosophy of life. What are the evaluation criteria for good people and bad people? People seem to be tolerant of judgment, but it is difficult to argue good or bad. With preconceived judgments, continue to watch movies, and subconsciously will explain the behavior of the character, because he is a good person, so. . . Because he is a bad guy, so. . . It is difficult to evaluate the quality of this world. Or I don’t like to make this value judgment. Everyone starts from their own point of view, out of their own rationality. Is the judgment of others really accurate? Good people get good rewards, bad people get bad rewards. The villain is neither good nor bad.
View more about The Good, the Bad and the Ugly reviews
