The film uses a lot of narration to metaphor the absurdity of war and its destruction of human nature through Wilder’s dictation, but it is very blunt, compared to the previously seen "Schindler's List" and "Full Metal Shell" , Its narrative method appears deliberate and mechanical.
The second half mainly describes what happened when a group of them entered Cambodia and stayed in Cambodia. When human beings are selfish, everything that does not concern themselves is unreasonable. In the following shots, the fishermen are shot and the girls are solved. , But saved a dog (war is in power, beasts are worth more than human lives), the result of the annihilation of human nature is all the scenes that have happened after Cambodia, but the dramatic interpretation in the lens language has become so awkward that it is very awkward. It's hard to see the development route of the story's emotional context. Finally, the more classic montage combination (the montage of cattle slaughter and murder) can be regarded as a tribute to Soviet movies. The Kurišov-style lens grouping method can be said to be a wonderful show at the beginning, and it becomes a tribute at the end. This kind of weird explanation, the performance of the ending is like the spiritual "death cycle" that appeared in the "Source Code". When Kurz died, the madness had ended, but the new madness had just begun-Wei Erd is the new madness. As long as the war is not over, people like Kurz will never be wiped out.
The movie story is great, but it's not that good. The three-hour movie is not very rewarding. I am going to brush the all-metal bullet case and Apocalypse Now, hoping to see something different from the first time. It is not recommended for people who watch less than a hundred films, its boring.
View more about Apocalypse Now reviews
