Briefly describe a few points

Gladyce 2022-08-28 23:22:06

1. Whether this film and the viewing of "Exhausted" can be compared in mirror images, including the death of the ending: one is the death inferred by the narrative, and the other is the death metaphorical in the narrative;
2. The formal discussion has reached a new level , almost to the point of congestion, prose, documentary, subversive shooting angles, backlighting, direct sound effects, textual involvement, author intervention...
3, Persos - Joan of Arc - Nana, thinking: step - Thinking: Divine Revelation - Thinking: The meaning of Joan of Arc, and the three endings are the same;
4. The long shadow in front of the camera - the prototype of the strategy that forces the audience to reflect on their own viewing position; ("Godard: Image, Sound and Politics")
5 , Chapter 11, Chapter 11, Chapter 11, Problems of Language and Communication, a forcibly inserted argumentative essay, important but just enough to spoil the film, forming a paradox about "mistakes";
6, need to read Su Shan Sontag's review of the film in "Against Interpretation."

View more about Vivre Sa Vie reviews

Extended Reading

Vivre Sa Vie quotes

  • The Philosopher: Someone once told me, "There's truth in everything, even in error."

    The Philosopher: It's true. It's true. That's what France didn't see in the 17th century. They thought one could avoid errors and lies, that one could live directly in the truth. I don't think it's possible. Hence Kant, Hegel, German philosophy: to bring us back to life and make us see that we must pass through error to arrive at truth.

  • Nana: What do you think about love?

    The Philosopher: The body had to come into it, and indeed, Leibniz introduced the contingent. Contingent truths and necessary truths make up life. German philosophy show us that in life, one thinks with the constraints and errors of life. One must manage with that. It's true.