Before the release of Aladdin, the first concern was about casting. After all, the blue skin of the lamp god is not easy to present. From the perspective of the finished film, this aspect is completely unnecessary. Shi Huang's shape is not thunderous at all. Apart from God, Aladdin, Princess Jasmine, Jia Fang and other characters are all integrated into the film. The story has a certain amount of innovation in the role of Deng Shen, coupled with the widely sung a whole new world, it is equivalent to saying that the animation is not suitable for animation. Made some additions and it turned out to be the icing on the cake for a hilarious two hours.
From this film, I can't help but think of The Lion King and Hua Mulan. The Lion King may be too close to the animals, so the animated expressions of animals in the animated version hardly show in the real lion version. Although the story is still the same, the visual effects are not Well, no one wants to see The Lion King as the animal world, right? On the other hand, Hua Mulan almost completely abandoned the story of the animation to create the original story. It is not clear if the theme is too much interference from the outside world in the creation, and the logic of the whole story is not very logical. In fact, it is based on the story of the animation. It was released after Aladdin, and such a result is really inappropriate!
Finally, perhaps the reason why Guy Ritchie's early works are so dazzling is that the level of turbulence in this film is very different from his past stealing, two big smoking guns and even the great detective Sherlock Holmes. You can see this without looking at the staff list. Was it directed by Guy Ritchie?
View more about Aladdin reviews
