I remember watching a debate competition when I first entered the school, "Is true love at first sight or love at first sight?" Actually, in my opinion, true love must be love at first sight. It's just too extravagant to dare to think about it happening to me.
Even if there is no feud between the two families, the destruction of young people must be the final outcome of love. Because conceptual love and real love are always different, showing a perfect love can only stay in that moment, and that moment becomes eternal. The sublime of love is precisely because it is unrealizable. (Maybe I'm pessimistic) Just like Neruda's poem "Because of love, me and you and we will always exist." I can't imagine what this kind of love would be like if it met the trivial details of reality, if life could be like Walter cared about each other as much as Katie did. But their love is full of too much passion (which is why it is called pure love), and without a sense of rationality, it may be difficult to "live".
Juliet said, "Romeo is not Romeo, I still love him." Without these things, how could love be possible? It is the family environment, interpersonal relationships, and aesthetic taste that form the current him. What he loves must be his physical and social attributes. Without this name, its meaning will collapse. Romeo could give up his name, but he couldn't deny the social significance it brought him. Of course love is pure two people, but how can this person be formed without social attributes?
Also, why is Xiao Lizi so handsome! From Jack in the Titanic to Romeo, they are all pure and innocent teenagers with a little starlight in their eyes. This kind of youthful feeling is really rare, and the light in his eyes can't be hidden. I haven't seen such clear eyes in a long time.
View more about Romeo + Juliet reviews
