Jingjing said that this was a very good disaster movie she had watched recently, so she recommended it. I don’t know that this is a dizzy look. I watched a movie that was not long before I watched it three times. After fainting for the first time, I thought I was unwell, so I hurried to bed and went to sleep. It was later discovered that this shooting technique was the key to stunning. Maybe this is the result of my closer look and louder earphones. Because other people didn't seem to react as much as I did.
It could have been a good, stable and complete movie, but after deliberately making an unconventional filming, it is actually very difficult. It’s actually not easy to understand what needs to be photographed when it needs to be shaken, and to understand what needs to be seen through the tip of the iceberg when the audience is deliberately not to take a panoramic view.
The most ingenious thing is to design the videotape as a tape with images of two good times before. This not only buried a dark line of another timeline in the process of the film, but also strengthened the contrast and heightened the atmosphere at the end.
What's not good enough? Recalling the disaster movies I watched before, the impression of "The Day After Tomorrow" may be even more profound. Because its premise is a series of changes caused by the deterioration of the global environment, which makes people reflect on it after reading it. Regardless of the positive significance of these reflections. But in contrast, Cloverfield did not achieve such an effect.
At least I did not reflect. Faintly ready to wash and fall asleep.
View more about Cloverfield reviews
