To be honest, what this movie wants to discuss is much heavier than his superficial frivolous style. There are a lot of ironies and mappings, and a lot of stereotypes, the most obvious being the Middle Eastern pancake, and I won't point out the rest.
The film largely discusses the role of religion. The director's point is clear: Religion deserves respect, even if its intention is to distort a fact. Here the film involves a question - discussed in "1984", discussed in "Beautiful New World" - would you like to know the truth and live in pain, or believe in the beautiful lie and live a happy life?
Objectively speaking, this makes no difference to the thing itself (the subject of truth), but to consciousness, the two options are worlds apart. For consciousness exists as an object of feeling. You can intuitively feel pain or pleasure. From the perspective of the purpose of "knowing the truth", knowing that everyone lives in a lie, there will be two purposes: the basic level is to satisfy one's own curiosity, and the deeper level is to use the truth for one's own benefit. Frank finally broke everyone's lies and led everyone to fight back, which can be said to be an altruistic act, letting people who don't want to do it (or "food") get rid of their tragic fate. But this is for the better development of my own group (let me say so).
Everyone lives in such a beautiful lie, should it be broken? There is a problem here, if you don't know that you are miserable, then you are not miserable. So are you miserable? Objectively speaking, it is impossible to judge. Because judging is inherently subjective.
For those who are deceived by lies, morality is not to be mentioned. So what about the morality of people who only lie? For example, in the movie "The Truman World", the town Christof created for Truman is moral or immoral for Truman? I think, can't comment. If Truman hadn't stumbled upon this false world, and Christof's production team had made no mistakes, Truman would have lived a peaceful and peaceful life in it. Is this good or bad for him? Don't many people in today's world just want this kind of life? Would you like to go in? - of course, provided you don't know he's fictional.
So here is the same. It can be said that "The great other side" is also the existence of a fictional town in "The Truman World" - religions have a certain tendency to avoid the world - we will always live in our own lies. Sometimes the discomfort of the truth is often more painful and more difficult to accept than you think.
View more about Sausage Party reviews
