The story is very simply that Mr. Hanks was designed to participate in a case that attempted to "liberate and redeem" mankind by slaughtering human beings through a virus, and finally defeated the big devil to save the world. The story is old-fashioned, the plot is boring, and except for the slightly stiff and straightforward "hell" scene in the title that creates some so-called "thriller" surges of adrenaline, the book's brilliant answering questions and getting clues are not detailed. It has been well explained, and many inexplicable feelings have been forcibly implanted. Isn't Mr. Dan's work solving puzzles one after another? Why did you intersperse with one paragraph after another? #BlackQuestionMarkface# Even so, I still give full marks, 50 to Dan Brown and 50 to Hanks. After all, in this era of rotten movies, this movie is a clear stream. Don't chase it. Good looks, no fancy clothes, no grandstanding, very good. Worth watching, after all we all owe Forrest a movie ticket. BTW, life can be a little boring at times, but the beauty of it is that you can make your own decisions. Therefore, some people who think they are superior to others do not have the right to decide the fate of others. [joy]
View more about Inferno reviews
