If the novel can get 10 points, the movie has at most 2 points.
The plot is oversimplified, and some places seem abrupt; then even if the simplified is unsatisfactory, the movie still has two and a half hours, which shows how procrastinated it is.
The intrigue between the members of the VANGER family did not show up; the
other main line, the conflict and opposition between the press and the business community, was only a brief pass. The protagonist's hardships and the hard-won victory of the final victory all disappeared.
The entangled and free and easy relationship between the leading actor and the three women left only an inexplicable year-long love under the circumstances that psychological activities could not be expressed.
HENRIK's brother HARALD is over 90 years old and can go hunting in the forest, which is a bit outrageous; in
order to save trouble, the key figure ANITA has cancer.
. . . .
Too much
is actually the abuse and abuse of the heroine and the guardian. It should be easy to take. In order to attract attention, it took about 20 minutes to interpret.
Speaking of the heroine, it also disappoints me. . . Although the novel is deviant, it is still pitiful. The flat-breasted female smoker in the movie is completely expressionless (perhaps because of the complicated psychological movie). The hairstyle is also ugly. Can you not do it? More hairspray?
Alas, maybe it’s because I love novels too much. I went out to work and read it in 4 days without releasing the scrolls. Watching this movie is simply suffering. Don't read the next part, just read the novel.
As for the prison that many people admire, I think it might be because he committed a misdemeanor. That prison is different from the prison for criminals and felons (it is slightly explained in the novel).
View more about The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo reviews
