seen in the early days are hard to remember. The most impressive ones are the films after 2000: "Queen of the Damned" and "Bloodrayne" . I like "Q", mainly Aaliyah, she is very sexy in the film, and she has the best vampire feeling. It's a pity that I can't see anymore. Kristanna's "B" can't compete with Aaliyah at all, and her waist is no longer visible in the film. In the plot, "Q" also greatly beats "B", which lacks the mystery, loneliness, and power that vampires give. "Underworld", I like the first one better than the second. Kate's figure is also great, cool and beautiful. By contrast, Scott is much worse, without the actor's demeanor. The second part in the supporting role should have been better than the first. Viktor is the main attraction in this one, and the vampires and werewolf bosses who like Selene are not very eye-catching. But there are powerful people like Marcus, William, and Alexandar in the second part.
The expectation was great, but it was a real disappointment. Perhaps what the film wants to highlight is Selene. Among Michael, Marcus, William, and Alexandar, only Marcus and Selene's confrontation are unsatisfactory. Few other people did not perform well. The result of this kind of character’s inaction greatly affected the plot. Michael, a hybrid, couldn’t see where he was strong, and was always weak. A werewolf like William, who should be strong, was simply defeated by Michael (I had to explain myself. Maybe William just woke up and was injured by Selene so his ability has not recovered or Michael's resurgence ability suddenly increased), Alexandar played completely as a literati.
The most important thing about the vampire film is that it is logical, and not to mention the small mistakes, the big mistake is that Michael easily defeated William, the difficulty of imprisoning the cemetery... all makes the second film much inferior to the first one.
View more about Underworld: Evolution reviews
