It seems to be verifying Xunzi's view that "nature is inherently evil" to some extent. Why do you say that? Seeing that under the mode of prison, these randomly selected people began to become stern, which made people have to reflect on how low the bottom line of human morality is. But in fact, there have been many literary and artistic works about the bottom line of human morality. For example, the British novel "Lord of the Flies", and then Sartre's "Confinement" can be considered. Professor Tan Peisheng, the theoretical giant of the Drama Literature Department of the Central Academy of Drama, put forward the theory of "situation theory" in the perspective of drama creation. The so-called situation theory has a very important assumption that although people have differences in nature, they are constantly encountered in acquired life. One situation after another is also more important. It is these situations that test and change people. Watching this movie at night is still very emotionally contagious. However, the film, as a work, can once again see the incomprehensible attitude of the creator. In this film, apart from exposing and criticizing sexual evil, I cannot see the creator telling us what we should do. (The ending ends the experiment only)
View more about The Stanford Prison Experiment reviews
