After reading a lot of reviews with low ratings, I feel that now everyone's criteria for judging movies are becoming more and more homogenized. There must be unexpected but concise plots, profound ideas and perfect logic, but the movie itself It's still an entertainment product. For me, it's really a movie that entertained me very well. This rating is indeed a bit pitiful, so I give it five stars.
It's not so much a suspect story, but a very complete psychological diagnosis and treatment. If the main plot, that is, the part of the game, is regarded as a boy's dream, then this is a very typical Freud case, and In this story, it is you and me who play Freud off-screen, playing with the different images in fantasy and reality, reasoning about the subconsciousness behind every detail in the virtual, such interaction is still Very cool ha. Freudian analysis is of course very superficial and very metaphysical for the psychological theory at this moment, but it is precisely because of such simplicity that the threshold of interaction has been greatly lowered, making this film a Very good mass entertainment product. It can even be said that this movie is an audience-oriented game. Understanding it from this perspective can also be related to the original plot design, which is quite subtle.
It is true that from the viewing angle of the movie, there are a lot of unnatural and uncomfortable details in the narrative rhythm, dialogue design, and character interaction, etc., but from another perspective, you can also put these The problem is regarded as a small bug that is inevitable when designing the plot of a child who is not deep in the world and specifically stated at the end that he is a withdrawn and unsociable child. If it is concluded that this is an intentional effect of the director and screenwriter, it would be too over-interpreted, but from an objective point of view, the final overall expression effect can still echo the world view of the film.
Today's audience always likes to pick every frame of a movie for its meaning, but as far as my personal aesthetics are concerned, a plot that is too result-oriented is too well-designed. feel comfortable. In the end, I hope that everyone will be more open and tolerant towards movies, including other literary and artistic works.
ps: Seeing that many people are questioning the part of the passion scene, I don’t think it’s necessary. Don’t misunderstand the thirteen-year-old boy’s understanding and desire for sex, and he is still a super IQ. The family background is complex and 99% tend to be precocious. My child, at least when I was thirteen years old, many of my male classmates had already revealed the essence of sexism... and there are those who think there are problems with morality and ethics. Morality is an acquired value, and human beings are definitely getting older. Younger people have no moral values.
View more about Serenity reviews