Together is not to forget, but to forgive!

Gerson 2022-03-22 09:02:04

As a billionaire, the second male meets the amazing heroine in the casino. For this reason, the second male is like a cat-and-mouse game against the male and female protagonists.

If the male lead lowers the bottom line and only gets the female lead's body, then he will undoubtedly succeed; if the male lead also lowers the bottom line and only uses the female lead to accompany the male lead for one night to get to one million, then he will also succeed Now; if the female lead's bottom line is lowered, and she can get 1 million just by staying with the second male one night, thus helping the male lead, or helping them both get rid of the poor and downright days, then the female lead has also succeeded.

However, there are not so many ifs in the world! The second male took advantage of his wealth, romance, and thoughtfulness to win the heroine for one night, and at the same time he wanted to capture the heroine's feelings. Very scheming, put a cruise card printed with the two of them spending a good night together in the hostess bag, and put her phone in the lining of the hostess wallet. It successfully ignited the jealous fire of the male protagonist, and at the same time successfully made the female protagonist sad and say goodbye, and finally succeeded in taking advantage of the emptiness and embraced the beauty again!

However, the female protagonist's original words when the second male first wanted to take advantage of the situation: They were a mistake at the beginning, and the second male was destined to fail in the end. This kind of transaction-like start is destined to be a wrong start. It's just that the second male is worthy of being a shopping mall giant, unlike the villains in other soap operas who get nothing in the end, or are arranged for more than the gains. But after seeing that he can only get the female protagonist's body in the end, and cannot capture the female protagonist's heart, he decided to let the female protagonist leave him completely and return to the male protagonist in a humiliating way at the right time. Although he didn't get the best result, he decided to end it decisively. Using a stop loss to describe the behavior of the second male is the basic quality that a rational and successful person should have. Therefore, the second male cannot be regarded as a complete success, but it cannot be said to be a complete failure.

The male protagonist, on the other hand, was very sad, and sent his lover to accompany the second male. Although he succeeded in getting one million, with one million comes a hurdle that will never be overcome in his heart! After several twists and turns, I had to give up one million, and finally let myself pass the insurmountable hurdle, and finally let the heroine come back to my side. It's just that in the last million, the heroine didn't score a single point, and the heroine let the second male give him N times in vain. Maybe the West was very open to this? Maybe the male protagonist uses the dialogue in the play: being together is not forgetting, but forgiving to successfully excuse his cowardice and incompetence!

And the female lead is the saddest in the film, dumped by the male lead and played with by the second male lead. It can also be said that she successfully broke the hearts of the male lead and the second male lead, but she is also a loser. Especially in the beginning of the play, he is very assertive and individual, and this is precisely the purpose of letting the second male lead to be beautiful at all costs. So in the end, the heroine was useless in the face of emotion and vanity, and she was a complete failure. . .

There are no winners in this game, they are all losers, but it just confirms one sentence: Never test human nature! In many cases, it is not the distinction between human beings who are inherently good and human beings inherently evil, but rather a thought of heaven and a thought of hell!

View more about Indecent Proposal reviews

Extended Reading

Indecent Proposal quotes

  • David: [while playing pool] I guess there's limits to what money can buy.

    John: Not many.

    Diana: Well some things aren't for sale.

    John: Such as?

    Diana: Well you can't buy people.

    John: That's naive, Diana. I buy people every day.

    Diana: In business, maybe, but you can't buy people not when real emotions are involved.

    John: So you're saying you can't buy love? That's a bit of a cliché don't you think?

    Diana: It's absolutely true.

    John: Is it? What do you think?

    David: I agree with Diana.

    John: You do? Well let's test the cliché. Suppose... I were to offer you one million dollars for one night with your wife.

    David: I'd assume you're kidding.

    John: Let's pretend I'm not. What would you say?

    Diana: He'd tell you to go to hell.

    John: I didn't hear him.

    David: I'd tell you to go to hell.

    John: That's a reflex answer because you view the question as hypothetical. But let's say that there was real money backing it up. I'm not kidding. A million dollars. The night would come and go but the money could last a lifetime. Think of it. A million dollars. A lifetime of security... for one night. Don't answer right away. Just consider it; seriously?

    David: We're positive, okay?

    John: Well then you've proved your point. There are limits to what money can buy. It's late, and I hate to admit it, but I have meetings in the morning. May I have one dance? With your permission.

    David: You know something? I think you better hurry on to that meeting. You don't want to miss out on your next billion.

    John: Understood. I wouldn't part with her either. Good night.

  • Diana: Somethings are not for sale.

    John: Such as?

    Diana: Well you can't buy people.