My doubts still fall on this affair, it is not clear, not clear, not clear, I think it is not that I do not understand but the director himself did not understand. I don't want to reiterate the lack of women's subjective perspective, but it can be said that the wife and lawyer's perspectives have not been clearly explained around this incident. When it is time to face the conflict, I feel that the director has avoided it. So there is no such conflicting and wonderful scene of a husband rubbing his wife's breasts.
Local power struggles and forced demolition are too relatable to repeat. But theocracy is relatively unfamiliar to me. I feel that theocracy is the driving force behind the regime, but a mad priest's rhetoric and the funny insinuation of the great priest can't make me feel so shocked. Feel.
The dialogue and dramatic conflict are too controlled. For example, the woman's death must be a suicide (I guessed when I saw the scene that alludes to death), so the woman's suicide serves as blood evidence to prove Leviathan's evil deeds. There are a few scenes where the language of the shots is very precise, such as the beginning of the affair switching scenes, such as the lawyer being beaten, such as the two court scenes, and the camera has put this conflict/fear out before the script. The script is very reasonanble but in this mythological metaphor I want to see miracles.
View more about Leviathan reviews
