However, there is no main line in this movie. If you insist, is it that scientists have discovered that there is a connection across time and space between humans with similar irises? And then prove the existence of God? Although the director uses a lot of scientific details (especially in the biological laboratory to describe the protagonist's major experimental findings in detail), I feel that the director does not believe in science, or is the kind of person who is frustrated by science, because he encounters one or two people. A problem that cannot be solved/explained by science and then comprehensively denies science, and goes to religion to the extreme. The director seems to think that the destination of scientists should also be religious, just like Newton. The director should be the kind of person with a scientific background and then religious, like Newton.
This movie is anticlimactic, you don't know what he's going to say. In my case, I just saw an extremely religious director who fears science, possibly a missionary film sponsored by the Vatican.
------------------------- I went to see the background of this film. I
was worried that it might be the screenwriter's intention. Well, don't worry about it now, screenwriter/ The script/director/producer is all him. I haven't seen any relevant scientific experience, but I started working in a film company in my sophomore year, so the director is definitely not someone with a scientific spirit, which basically matches his understanding of science.
I can't find anything else, so it can't actually be called "sci-fi". I don't understand that this film can win awards. Maybe the actors did a good job. The plot is really nothing.
View more about I Origins reviews
