I thought it wasn't as meaningful as the original.
Monroe's novels consist of three novels, each with its own theme, and the time is often fragmented and stopped abruptly at important moments. The three articles here combined into one movie feel that what they want to express is not very clear. The storyline loses its hazy beauty after being visualized by the performance, although Monroe's own words are so calm and realistic.
There are even two plot adaptations in the film that I disagree with: 1. Juliet stops Eric's hand from touching down on the train. Which means they didn't fuck. Even so, she could still run to his house to find him because of a letter. And the film actually let them dry firewood on the train. . . 2. Many episodes of Juliet at her father's house have been deleted. Forget it, and the episodes of arguing with the priest have also been deleted! ! This has a great effect on Penelope's lack of belief later, so it was deleted! ! Can't bear it.
I know that it is inevitable to make some adaptations of literary works for film and television, but this kind of inexplicable adaptation is still difficult to accept.
View more about Julieta reviews