At first, I thought the story of turning into a repeater under patriarchal dictatorship was a cliché. Later, I thought that I might also have the attributes of a repeater. After expressing a little bit of opinion, I have to bring a isnt it suffix to buy a wrong-talking insurance. ; also not good at making decisions for themselves or paying for the consequences of self-determination, hoping to make some changes.
Then, the film's biographical attributes are about as credible as Volkov's Shostakovich memoirs. To put it simply, his dad was really against him going abroad, but he wasn't a control freak, and he didn't cut ties and let him go home after he got sick (Wikipedia). As a result, in the film, his dad was portrayed as pressing the ground while hitting and saying that no one in this world loves you like I do. Not even nonfiction, but biopic?
Then I thought that many biographies of musicians (books or movies) I have read before tend to highlight some unimaginable and rare external forces in the protagonist's growing environment, so the protagonist naturally grows into a clear-cut (but may not be true) 's Facebook. In narratives that connect these external forces with the personal characteristics of the musicians (whether in character or musical interpretation style), there is often also a sense of motivation to reinforce (or even distort) parts of the truth in order to improve the logic of the narrative. It would be boring to make so-called biopics like this. In a nutshell, overinterpreting fake news.
Most musicians aren't Goulds, don't have neurotic habits, and scientists don't all have floppy white hair. If you want to consume emotions, you can read novels, and if you want music experience, you can listen to discs and watch interviews or serious biographies. These two are fine to look at alone, but the reality of consuming stereotypes in the name of biographies is not a problem.
I can give 3-4 stars when watching a drama.
View more about Shine reviews