I'm still just ranting about a few points.
1. The lines are said slowly, inexplicable long shots, strange fantasy? Is it because the audience is stupid, thinking that something so inscrutable can be considered a good movie?
2. Are those motorcycle riders human or ghost? Is it a ghost to speak in a terrifying tone? Still riding a motorcycle? Still shooting? Still watching av? Bleeding after death?
3. The whole movie is so playful. The lines spoken by the protagonist and the supporting characters are all inscrutable pretense, and some strange things cannot be connected at all (this is the difference with David Lynch) )
4. I thought it was a psychological film when I saw the previous fantasy, and I knew it was a revenge film when I saw the woman was burned to death... Then I don't understand, what effect does the mess in the front have on the theme of the film? bedding? render? I'm sorry, I really feel that the first half is bad. I guess I want to imitate David Lynch's works. From the bad guy, what kind of God is inexplicable...and a little bit reliant on religious films, but in the end the bad guy begged for mercy from the male protagonist? What kind of bullshit religion?
5. So the whole movie is a revenge movie, and other things are inexplicably added to pretend b, thinking that the audience can't understand it and make it unreal to make it a good movie? Please not everyone is a 5-star follower
View more about Mandy reviews
