My opinion is that the "facts it reveals" I think are false facts. Stand on a higher moral high ground, and then judge the phenomenon in food production.
Let me talk about the phenomena in food production. If they are judged according to the standardized production standards, there is no doubt that they are complying. Then if the final result is wrong, the fault is not in the capital-operated enterprise, but in the standard. What's more, what is pointed out in the film is more of a descriptive argument, and there is no direct first-hand data to prove the inner connection between the phenomenon and the problem that they blamed in the end.
Moreover, the reason why they can have a higher moral commanding heights is the economic foundation. From a direct observation of reality, in the state where I live, organic or so-called health products and ordinary products are clearly marked and sold separately, and consumers have the right to choose products based on their economic strength.
I also pay attention to the example of having no money to buy vegetables and only eating junk food, and finally having to spend more money on medical treatment, but I have come to a different conclusion. From an economic point of view, I think it means that The vegetable market has greater profit margins, capital will enter as soon as possible, and the price determined by the relationship between supply and demand will naturally fall. If we observe from biology, the conclusion should be that we should accelerate the rationalization and improvement of large-scale industrialized vegetable production.
The fundamental reason for this phenomenon lies in the excessive expansion of the human population and the rigid demand for human food. When the relatively poor population exists objectively and the number is huge, the necessity of the existence of large-scale food companies cannot be denied.
The unclear doubts and doubts conveyed by the film are the same as many conspiracy theories, using people's fear of monopoly to strengthen the spread of their own views. I don't deny that the industrialized production of food will bring problems, but simply using films of this level to try to explain is lacking. It is even more undesirable to use this kind of popular film as your own argument.
=== The
film bluntly reflects the fear of capital operation and capital concentration. The existence of this fear is inseparable from the origin of freedom in American culture. Further discussions may deviate from the current topic. Expanded again.
A little messy, welcome to make a brick
View more about Food, Inc. reviews
