One of 2020 must-see videos

Damian 2021-12-21 08:01:08

Foreword: For most people, movies are a time and money-consuming pastime. Whether a movie is worth watching depends on whether the audience can enjoy this movie time. Generally speaking, it is not worth the fare (of course, time also counts as the fare). The discussion of a movie is multi-angled. I just want to tell you why I recommend this movie, why this movie is worth watching, and it is worth our time and money to enjoy this time.

Why is it full marks. Because the experience of this film in the context of the epidemic is unique. In the past year, apart from the Greyhound, there hasn't been a movie that can give me this kind of immersion. The immersion brought by the restricted perspective is unparalleled. It's like a first-person perspective in a game. The perspective of this work has never left the Greyhound. Such an operation weakens the overall view of the plot and so on. But the sensory experience brought to the audience is first-rate. This movie focuses on the audience's experience when watching the movie. I think the Greyhound is a pity film. That is, the degree of completion is not high, and the degree of completion of the film is limited. The emotional line is not even finished. The epidemic is coming and the streaming media APPLE+ stop loss hastily. It's a pity that this kind of war movie with a sense of experience is not shown in theaters. If the film can be made completely and can be shown in theaters, I think it has the strength to get more nominations and even awards.


Although this film has regrets, the key part of the war is considered complete. If you are a person who only likes to watch idols, you can watch some anti-cancer moral kidnapping movies. Then you may not feel the experience of this movie. In addition, I highly recommend that you set aside an hour to experience this movie.


Nagging time

I have seen some comments, and the nautical terminology used to comment on the video is useless. I think it helps to improve the sense of presence for ordinary audiences. It can also meet the needs of hardcore military fans. If I don't even realize this point, then I can only euphemistically use seeking common ground while reserving differences to show that these critics have limited appreciation.

In terms of the positioning of the film, I think this film is a battle for immersiveness on the big screen. If the production goals are consistent, then most of these films are good films.

Different from 1917, both are movies that focus on experiencing the sense of reality. 1917 is more about the cruelty of war. But the Greyhound is more of the tension and excitement brought about by war. But in terms of experience, the Greyhound is easier and more entertaining than 1917. The experience of the two is also different. In 1917, it was more on-site, and the Greyhound became more protagonist.

View more about Greyhound reviews

Extended Reading
  • Arnulfo 2022-03-25 09:01:10

    A film about faith built on terminology, sound effects and atmosphere. It might be a different experience to watch this movie on the big screen. Don't procrastinate, don't procrastinate, stop here in 90 minutes.

  • Wallace 2021-12-21 08:01:08

    Tom Hanks played soldiers, captains, train captains, captains, captains, captains, astronauts, prison guards, FBI, engineers, symbol experts, newspaper editors, lawyers, producers, toys, cars... all Over and over, life is complete.

Greyhound quotes

  • Gray Wolf: [on radio] Greyhound, good luck surviving the night.