Topics over reasoning

Brittany 2022-04-21 09:01:07

Perhaps some directors now care more and more about whether their works lack artistry, logic, or even basic storytelling. What they really care about is whether their works are topical. Because in this era of developed Internet and public noise, not all people have the ability or interest to evaluate the quality of your work, but most people have the ability and great interest to gossip about your work. Works, if your work is topical enough, then congratulations, there will be countless people enthusiastically joining the gossip feast you offer, they will not only act as your publicity for free, but also selflessly Make your own contribution to the box office results. If you capture the hearts of these audiences, it can be said to kill two birds with one stone. I think the director of this film must know this, otherwise the film would not be so emotional.
When I first heard about this film, I really thought it would be an adaptation of the original book, but I later learned that it was based on a manga of the same name. It should be the case. The stories in the original work have long been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, and there are countless film and television works adapted from it. If you continue to use the original work to adapt, in this era of eyeballs, the new ideas are limited, and the chances of winning in the market seem to be low. However, I feel that if we can concentrate our superior resources and put an original work on the big screen, it may not have a market effect. The "Les Miserables" released last year is a good example. Let's see if anyone is willing to do it. For some things, if you don’t care much about market benefits and just want to do a good job, the market benefits may come to you automatically.
The two male protagonists in the film are well matched, Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law, both Zhuang and Harmony, one hot and one cold. To a certain extent, their rivalry in the film has become the film's main feature. "Core", the attention and discussion it has caused has even surpassed the plot and bizarre suspense of the film. And the director seems to deliberately handle the relationship between the two to be ambiguous, hesitant to speak, and specious. And it is also happy to cause illusions and misunderstandings to the audience, so as to increase the topicality of the film, so you will see the two people quarreling like a couple for a long time in the film, and some places are deliberately done. Clearly revealed.
Robert Downey Jr. continued the "two hundred and five" temperament cultivated in "Iron Man" into this film and carried it forward. To be honest, every time I watch his play, I have a kind of "no madness, no survival". "The feeling of this person is often a big beard, and as a result, his face is flirtatious at every turn, really crazy. Jude Law has a ruthless temperament. To be honest, he wears a plaid suit. Jude Law is more British than the American actor, and he is more close to the background of the story. It seems that temperament is really a thing. Not fooling around. Rachel McAdams, the leading actress, has a sweet face, and it makes people feel sweet when she looks at it. The role she plays in the movie is really cunning and cunning. Overall, it should be considered a success in selling cuteness.
Finally, let’s talk about the plot. It stands to reason that a work that uses Sherlock Holmes as a signboard should have a plausible reasoning story. To be honest, there really is such a story, but its level of reasoning is really only reasonable. Not a shitty level. In Sherlock Holmes's last Hollywood-style reasoning while fighting, a lot of chemicals and formula preparations whose names are omitted are full of reasoning. The nice thing is to say it is four or two thousand pounds, and the ugly thing is to be lazy. I actually like it. I dislike such a way of handling. If you don't have the ability to answer, why should you give yourself such a difficult question? Not only embarrassed himself, but also perfunctory the audience. Fortunately, this film avoids the key points and does not focus on reasoning. Among those topics that have been said before, I really hope that the producers can use such ingenuity and ingenuity on reasoning. In this case, the style of this film will be Another look.

View more about Sherlock Holmes reviews

Extended Reading
  • Harry 2021-10-20 18:58:49

    When Sherlock Holmes became the Iron Man into the sky

  • Alexa 2022-03-25 09:01:05

    I like the retro scene, I like it

Sherlock Holmes quotes

  • Dr. John Watson: What of Mary?

    Palm Reader: M for Mary. For marriage. Oh, you will be married!

    Dr. John Watson: [nodding his head slowly] Go on.

    Palm Reader: [looking intensely at Watson's palm] Oh, I see pattern tablecloth and... Oh, china figurines and... Ugh! Lace doilies!

    Sherlock Holmes: [pretending to be deep in thought] Mmm... Doilies!

    Dr. John Watson: Lace... doilies? Holmes! Does your depravity know no bounds?

    Sherlock Holmes: No!

    Palm Reader: [continuing her prophecies about Mary] Oh, then she turns fat and, ugh, she has a beard and...

    Sherlock Holmes: What of the warts?

    Palm Reader: Ah, she's covered in warts!

    Dr. John Watson: [interrupting the palm reader] Enough, enough!

    Sherlock Holmes: Are they extensive?

    Dr. John Watson: Please, enough!

  • Lord Blackwood: Sherlock Holmes... and his loyal dog. Tell me, Doctor, as a medical man, have you enjoyed my work?

    Dr. John Watson: Let me show you how much I've enjoyed it...

    [He rushes at Blackwood, Holmes holds him back]

    Sherlock Holmes: Watson, don't! Observe...

    [Watson sees Blackwood's trap]

    Dr. John Watson: How did you see that?

    Sherlock Holmes: Because I was looking for it.