"The Detective Sherlock Holmes" is actually a work by Sherlock Holmes, this completely subversive version of Sherlock Holmes, it is also very beautiful. Although the end of the decisive battle is a little bit overwhelming, Guy Ritchie succeeded in recreating the gloomy look of Victorian London (it is said to be a city overflowing with sewage and criminals), and Downey and Jude Law joined forces. A pair of perfect partners for "the shape and dispersal of the spirit,"-on appearance, temperament, behavior, and the original work are altogether different, but the friendship and reasoning inside have not been weakened by the different adaptations.
When it came to "Detective Sherlock Holmes", Guy Ritchie put away the self-produced self-style show and changed to the mainstream commercial route, but still habitually added some innocuous narrative tricks to show that he has not yet It is completely in line with the odor of Hollywood's copper. I believe Holmes will continue to shoot like 007, the difference is that he will not travel around the world like 007, Holmes should not leave Baker Street. As the first film in a series, it is more important to establish a reproducible form template and a sustainable story model for the latecomers. In the future, we will hear that secret music repeatedly on the gloomy stone roads of the streets of London. theme. This should not be the plot model that traditional Sherlock Holmes fans are enthusiastic about and expect. This Sherlock Holmes is more agile than his skill. Want to see the large-scale case restoration and reasoning explanation of "The Tragedy on the Nile"? Sorry, this is not true. Even if there is, it is just a glimpse of light, or I think Guy Ritchie simply wants the audience to ignore these things. He just focuses on how to make this process interesting.
Many plots of the new version of the movie "Holmes" may have been inspired by "The Da Vinci Code" and "National Treasure", and the relationship between Holmes and Watson in it reminds us of the classic Western movie "Little Tiger". To many people, "Holmes" directed by Guy Ritchie is like the Victorian version of "Fight Club". Will Conan Doyle like the muscular man version of Sherlock Holmes? Certainly not. It is not the role played by Downey-he has a weird temperament, winks his eyebrows, and even put on eyeshadow in one scene-Downey's Holmes prefers to use his fist to solve cases, and lacks Conan Doyle's characters similarities. Although Conan Doyle was a boxer when he was young, he would definitely fall apart if he saw Holmes fighting against people with bare hands.
The crime-solving story in the film feels like a fusion, splicing many classic bridges that seem to be familiar to each other. The place where the story takes place is the castle-the cell-the cemetery outside the church-the former residence of the deceased-the dock-the slaughterhouse-the secret organization-the underground waterway-the suspension bridge. Gerich adopted a fast-paced, single-handed, straight-forward narrative method without using multiple clues to confuse the audience. This case is suspenseful, but overall it is not nervous and scary. There is no pretending to be a ghost, but there are many hilarious episodes, such as the dog.
