But it's still worth a look. It's a popular science for yourself about the operation of Washington.
I strongly feel that the Chinese people are much more sharp and thorough in the comments on the play than the Americans. No way, we are born political animals. For example, when we see the brick that affects the education bill and the strike and peace talks, we will naturally think that this must be the idea of the male protagonist. But the trade union representatives in the play actually got it. The so-called city government, but it is.
Sharp is sharp, thorough and thorough, but it does not mean that I sympathize/support/appreciate the male protagonist. Because of the design of the first perspective, the audience can easily unite with the male protagonist and feel the same hatred psychologically. But the best part of Western humanities is to admit that the mole cricket is also a life, and the grass people also have a personality. The writers didn't forget to create other characters. Judging from the story of the heroine and several important supporting characters, this clever, ambitious, and urban man with no lower limit still lacks great wisdom: he thinks that he is the only one with a superior IQ in the world. As everyone knows, according to the law of the jungle arranged by God, the animals at the top of the food chain often do not hold for long. The male protagonist rowed the boat desperately, and it was the screenwriter who told the audience that after all, it was a manual job.
In addition, take a look at the interior decoration of urban style inside, and find a lot of ideas for yourself.
View more about House of Cards reviews
