To be clear, I personally prefer pixar [shrugs], so I wrote it in a framing attitude.
First of all, the food chain is gone, which is very good. There are
no more carnivores. There are no wolves eating rabbits, so there can be hundreds of rabbits in a litter. It’s just that Disney can come up with it, and it’s a pity that this film was not made by Pixar. Please, Pixar is not so brainless yet.
Second, the main plot is very vulgar, and
the weak-looking protagonist must be talented and not meet the
bad protagonist. People must be forgiven
. In normal concepts, rabbits are flexible and foxes are smart. They are never useless. Is it fresh? Using the magnification of an advantage to cover up a disadvantage (the rabbit's lack of strength), I recalled the sentence I often wrote in elementary school: carry forward the advantages and correct the shortcomings.
Let's see how the Insider team handles this problem.
Joy thinks she is the best and can give the little girl the most help. As the plot develops, she finds that sadness is also very important.
Sadness seems to be a negative character, but it turns out that her shortcomings play an important role, and she herself has not undergone any essential changes.
I think Crazy Zoo has not surpassed Invincible Destruction King. From my own values, at least in Invincible Destruction King, Destruction King can only do damage from beginning to end, because some things are to be demolished, so he will Can play to their strengths; the little princess is still cheap: use some bugs to help yourself win.
I remember the teacher taught, this is called - the three-dimensionality of the characters.
Third, everything is within the system
Crazy Zoo, what I want is change, I was wrong, I want to change myself; it was someone else who was good, but went down the wrong path, I want to help him correct. Everyone is fine. If the reforms are really bad, they will be locked up, everyone will stop fighting, the world will be united, and the world will be a better place.
The mind team is, I was wrong, it's just that there is a problem with the view, whether it is positive or negative, we must face it up and accept it.
Pixar also has a dark side. The punishment given by Pixar is not to let the police officer take away such a system. Think of the bad guys in the three Toy Story movies. They were scared to pee, assigned to bear children, and hung in front of trucks. If you want to punish, you have to punish it a little bit better, what about watching Sachira's plot in prison. . . Alas, really boring.
Finally, I would like to say a few words for Mayor Sheep.
The most elusive crime in the whole article is to use any means to fight for the interests of one's own race. I would like to ask, the fox who started to be kidnapped after being put on a bite guard once, still has a chance to reform, (pay attention!! He just said why he was kidnapped, and then everyone sympathized with him, and then He helped detect the case and was influenced by the rabbit again, but! He didn't repent! He didn't repent! He didn't repent!) And there was no punishment at all; instead, he was a sheep who has been discriminated against and wants to turn his back on his own race. What's wrong with the mayor? Just because people play big chess? Are you sure you're not misleading teenagers? Is Sanguan Evening Festival not guaranteed?
Some people say that this film is suitable for all ages. Yes, the old thinks that the three views are very positive, and the young think it is cute and kind. It is indeed suitable for all ages, but ask the mainstream crowd, do you all like this kind of old-fashioned preaching? Do you all like this kind of true, kind and beautiful heroine?
Let's go back and watch Korean dramas
View more about Zootopia reviews
