Paris scenery humanistic propaganda film shell American film-style self-deprecating

As early as the beginning of the 2000s, the red nostalgic culture swept together from the oil painting art circle to the design of small commodities, to the more prosperous Republic of China after 2010, it seems that in different countries, there is a trend of thinking about the past. And especially widely appeared in some cultural workers. Han Han's rebellious period of shouting that the writer he likes is not alive is still in his ears. I don't intend to directly substitute this film for the suspicion that American films make fun of French culture. This is not a literary film, nor a fantasy film. It's just a "sketch" (personal opinion) that the literary and art workers collectively laugh at themselves under the high humanistic scenery. I laughed out loud when a 19th-century celebrity said his best era was the Renaissance. So if you want to travel to the Renaissance and ask Raphael?

The long-standing legend of the era, the different life in a foreign country, sometimes the essence of which one is obsessed and longed for is the same. Isn't it indifference to the current reality, even powerless...? I've always wanted to make stories about these kinds of propositions, but Woody Allen made it happen with a simpler appeal. This is the usual American movie. It is not as good as a literary film, which makes people seem to understand but not understand, and there are hundreds of interpretations; it is such a clear universal value. Give the general public a little warmth that is approachable.

I don't have a complex of old times, but 80% of the writers and entertainers I like were almost 100 years ago, and 90% are foreign. This is Mark's question to himself here.

Finally, the poster "Starry Night" is so beautifully quoted but not as good as Van Gogh. Liar.

View more about Midnight in Paris reviews