The feeling of this movie makes me think about the director's narrative technique. Although it is not uncommon to deduce biographical characters through the narration of a third person, it is worth pondering on the perspective of this movie. The opponent Salieri tells Mozart, which is indeed the story of Mozart, but Salieri has more scenes and more performance space.
What is applauded is to use the musical enemies in life to tell the legends, so that the film is full of themes, otherwise the biographies will be remade into films, and most of them will be reduced to running accounts and finally fail. However, some films consider the masses, 90% will Revolving around the theme of love, fortunately, the film is not about love, but with 'jealousy' as the theme to extend the plot, I really appreciate the way this film is, because Salieri is jealous of Mozart's Talent, showing such a Mozart with the relationship between the two of them, highlights and contrasts Salieri's unattainable and unattainable musical talent. In addition, different perspectives are enough to affect the direction and feeling of the whole story, because looking at it on Surrey, the Mozart presented is relatively flat, like the eyes of ordinary people and all living beings. The main problem is Tom Haas's acting skills. In fact, the audience can definitely feel Tom Haas's dedication and hard work when watching the performance. The performances in several scenes are very moving, but the screenwriter himself presents such an appearance. Instead, it is Murray Abraham. The performances can play more places, the performance is more eye-catching, and the award is well deserved.
Before watching the movie, I didn't have any research on Mozart's life and the music history of that period, so I just watched Mozart in the movie. Talent, feeling that his gestures are full of out-of-order gestures, does not mean that he is not smart, the words he spit out can have something to say, it is really genius-like words, maybe God is fair, giving him such a talent, but But giving him such a flawed personality has created his tragic life.
What if there was another film in first person, Mozart himself? There must be his reasons and reasons for what he does. I think it will show more rationalization and complexity. It will not be like the movie, where the personality and temperament are a bit ugly. I even think that even if it is viewed by a loyal fan , but also can inject more understanding and inner interpretation.
Suddenly, I want to know the history of this period, the history of music, and what kind of character Mozart himself was. Through this film, we can also have a superficial understanding of Mozart's music, composition history and his life.
The director's version is more than three hours long, but it does not feel cold and impatient at all. After I finish it, I will keep thinking about it. The more I think about it, the more I think it is a good movie. What other movie is more worthy of filming and more worthy of the world to watch than a story with such a theme?
View more about Amadeus reviews
