I have to admit that the 2.5 minute trailer made me believe that this is a good movie, and I also liked director Jason Reitman's old work. How do we define a good literary film? The simplest is nothing but the reflection and reflection brought to us after reading the story. The plots of flowing clouds and flowing water should be reasonable and unexpected, not the illusory and unrealistic fabricated by commercial films, leaving empty space for obscenity thinking. We desperately need movies like this to lift the veil on life and see it for what it is or another face.
Back to the plot, Clooney is a person who escapes from real life. This should be the idea of most people, including me. In fact, isn't the life of flying around the world for 350 days unreal? Real flight attendants, hotel services, strangers on the road, layoffs of all kinds. It should be said that Clooney is escaping the social interpersonal and responsibilities that the society has given us, including the way of life. In my opinion, to this day, choosing to live in this way cannot be defined as escaping some of the traditions that are attached to you and me. For example, in marriage, why do people have to find someone to stay with themselves for a lifetime? Yes, the journey of life requires companionship, because we have an inexplicable and indescribable fear of unknown loneliness, and we pin our feelings and expectations on others to find solace. Does this reflect our lack of confidence in life?
Americans often say that the land of freedom speaks for itself, and everyone has the right to choose their own way of life and even a way of life. We should ask ourselves what we want.
Unfortunately, when the plot interprets the backpack theory, it does not prove how clooney can get rid of his dependence on others and that a person who is out of the conventional social circle is not alone. The whole movie made me feel a kind of affection, that is: life is short, when you turn into a pinch of loess, only you can understand your own story. Those hesitations that are difficult to choose, the success in the hearts of people, and the emotions that make people cry.
Open your eyes, you may be the best audience.
What really made me understand this is because the director did not paint C's social communication and family life with strong colors. No alcoholic fathers, mean siblings, no exorbitant taxes, not to mention political persecution. That way, we sat down enough to think hard about why Clooney chose to live like this and become addicted to it.
However, the director seems to be a swinger. Maybe life is so incompatible. When Clooney went back to Ohome and saw that the beautiful neighbor arranged by the director already had a boyfriend, I couldn't help but feel embarrassed. What did we lose? what.
Later, I thought that clooney's flight to the heroine's home in Chicago was a moment of weakness, and aspiring viewers could find that the trailer called it an unrealistic idea of life. This is actually an unspoken rule created by movie pop music love novels. Even if it has become a general trend, this is just a way of expressing feelings. Or to use the words of Zhang Xiaoxian, the originator of romance, finding someone in the ends of the earth is a poignant thing, but most people don't need to go to the ends of the earth to find someone.
It takes some age to understand this story, and if I were older, I think I would have more emotion and resonance.
In the end, clooney stood under the huge banner of the flight table, and life was left to us to choose.
.
View more about Up in the Air reviews
