View more about Zero Dark Thirty reviews
A living counter-terrorism story
Marlee 2022-04-20 09:01:15
A very successful film. Regardless of whether it is a full restoration of the real process, the storytelling and logic are all natural and rigorous. Let's put aside the political purpose of counter-terrorism for the time being. Just for this film, the extreme acts of terrorists have caused great trauma and psychological shadows to ordinary innocent civilians, and the anti-terrorism activists have also won respect for their efforts to turn the tide. The impact of the 9/11 incident on the world has always existed. Anti-terrorism is a cruel war, which not only caused disasters to civilians, but also caused both the good and the evil to fall into an endless vortex of pain. For the sake of intelligence, it can violate human morality. Hiding can also use the elderly and the weak as cover. Intelligence and valuable information are the focal points of contention between the two sides. In the scene of killing bin Laden, the dark shooting technique was very successful, and the tension and exploration under the night vision goggles were well performed. At the end of the film, the heroine successfully completed the task and got on the plane to the mainland. There was no exciting music, only to complete the task, prove herself, remember her comrades in arms, and cry of endless hardships. Recommended video.
Extended Reading
-
Shanon 2022-03-25 09:01:06
Ten years of data acquisition and irrelevant plots are too long and trivial to make people sleepy. It is better to focus on key information acquisition and raid operations. Is Catherine Bigelow going to be an American female national teacher?
-
Tanya 2022-03-24 09:01:22
Interrogation, explosion, reinterrogation, explosion again, and finally beheading, that's all.
-
[last lines]
C-130 Pilot: You can sit where you want. You're the only one on manifest.
[pause]
C-130 Pilot: You must be pretty important. You gotta whole plane to yourself. Where you wanna go?
-
National Security Adviser: If this was political, we'd be having this conversation in October when there's an election bump. This is pure risk, based on deductive reasoning, inference, supposition, and the only human reporting you have is six years old, from detainees who were questioned under duress. The political move here is to tell you to go fuck yourself and remind you that I was in the room when your old boss pitched WMD Iraq. At least there you guys brought photographs.
George: You know, you're right. I agree with everything you just said. What I meant was, a man in your position, how do you evaluate the risk of *not* doing something? Hmm? The risk of potentially letting bin Laden slip through your finger. That is a fascinating question.