Linda Lovelace , the heroine of the erotic film " Deep Throat " that has created hundreds of millions of dollars in the box office , is the cover girl of the era of sexual liberation. The influence of "Deep Throat" in the United States is so large that it has spread to the United States. It was highly crowded by sexual liberation people for a time, which triggered a controversy with conservatives. The production company and cast and crew at the time were therefore sued in court, and the actor was also sentenced to 5 years in prison. The reporter who provided clues to the Washington Post reporter by the US President Nixon " Watergate scandal " called himself "Deep Throat." In real life, Linda Lovelace couldn't bear the torture brought by her husband Chuck and the bad influence the film brought to her. Since then, she has been the spokesperson of the American anti-pornography movement.
At the beginning of the film "Lovelace", Lovelace, who was about 20 years old, resented that her little friend had uncovered her bra and was swimming naked. He thought she would be a conservative girl next door, but afterwards we knew that she had a child who was unfamiliar. Chuck, a man, soon made it easy for him to go to bed with his passion, and tried all the sexual skills he had never tried. It can be seen that Lovelace is also a member of many sexual liberation members. And it was precisely this strange man Chuck that allowed her to live a tragic and brilliant life.
The dual repression from religion and patriarchy made Lovelace a strong feminist color. Lovelace was beaten by Chuck and returned to his parents' home late at night hoping to get the protection of his mother. However, the fanatical Puritan mother made her daughter obey her husband. Thinks that she has no right to call the shots for her daughter. And Chuck dominates everything about Lovelace with his powerful male hegemony, and unscrupulously forced Lovelace to shoot tertiary films, accept sex transactions, and unprincipled beatings. Frail girls simply can't bear it, let alone resist all of this. Women's status has not changed substantially in the United States in the 1960s and 70s, and they are still crawling under the feet of men.
The director seems to have no intention of focusing too much on feminism and sexual liberation. Linda Lovelace’s story of a woman who stumbled and was deceived into taking pictures for prostitution completely empties the sense of the times. It may happen in any era and will be sympathetic. This drama of sexual liberation and anti-feminism was filmed as a misfortune caused by marriage and family conflicts. Amanda Seyfried, who has big eyes and a baby-like face, plays Lovelace. For biopics, if the script, director, and actors are not problematic, they will definitely get an Oscar nomination. However, the 90-minute film length is clearly divided into two parts, one is the glorious history of Lovelace, and the other is the history of masochism. The frequent use of flashbacks supports a complete story. Amanda's performance will obviously have a front. The contrast between the front and the back, but the incoherent segmentation makes the transformation of the character itself seem too abrupt, from heaven to hell, almost the same face is changing through makeup without any difference.