The Gospel According to St. Matthew movie plot

2022-04-06 08:01
In the Catholic country of The Republic of Italy, very few people actually read the Bible. Most people get to know Jesus through the narration of the clergy. That's why this "faithful to the original" film was so shocking when it came out--because it featured a new and original Jesus.
Pasolini, a Marxist atheist who has been labelled as a "depraved", won unanimous praise from people of different positions when the film came out. He "reduced" Jesus as a revolutionary standing with the common people on the barren scorched earth. The real faces of a large number of non-professional actors in the film, including the speechless Joseph and Maria (an elderly Maria, played by the director's own mother), are touchingly simple. Jesus' long speeches, combined with the fervent and alienated eyes of the actors, are very convincing. Pasolini does not remove the sanctity and mystery of Jesus from a realistic point of view, but focuses on the sensibility of Jesus, which coexists with various miracles, and becomes an idealized poem to save the destitute. What Solini recognizes: At the deepest level, Marxism and the divinity of Christ have an inherent commonality.
Mark is too crude, John too mystical, Luke too sentimental, too bourgeois. In Pasolini's eyes, Il Vangelo Secondo Matteo is the only Gospel with a national-popular epic quality, which his film successfully conveys. Compared with the American films "Superstar of All Ages" and "The Last Temptation of Christ", which secularized Jesus in the future, the pure images of this film are closer to the style of national documentaries. From this, it can be seen that The Republic of Italy film has transformed from neo-realism. process, and Bassolini's unique poetic essence. Even stripped of any ideology, it's still a stunningly beautiful image.
<< Foxtrot evaluation action Il Sorpasso production and distribution >>
Extended Reading
  • Elizabeth 2022-04-06 08:01:02

    A/ Jesus seems supposed to be the absolute center. But in so many scenes, even in his sermons, he is only marginal, unable to be instantly anchored in the picture. Although his face was recited repeatedly, it was accumulated and superimposed like a steady movement. But this is only given in an extremely concise way, just as the faces of its followers and people are also presented, but it does not lead to emotions but directly to ideas. One can't help but wonder if this camera system is really just a narrative need or a humane pity? Or even further: it has been distilled into a fully open machine/schema of constructive equality? Perhaps even further than The Passion of Joan of Arc.

  • Josie 2022-04-09 09:01:09

    The black and white rough image style, the hard shadow tone is simple and serious to the point of trembling. In fact, it is best to read the Bible before the movie, otherwise it will be difficult to understand. This is an angry, serious, stereotyped image of Jesus. So his few smiles are very touching. Contrary to the simple video style, the director never hesitates to express his emotions with beautiful and atmospheric background music. When the face of the leper was cleansed and the crowd saw the resurrection of Jesus, everyone could feel joy through the sudden upbeat music. Presumably what religion needs is such an unadorned primitive expression. Mussolini, he was religious.

The Gospel According to St. Matthew quotes

  • Christ: Capharnaum, do you hope to be lifted to heaven? You shall fall low as hell.

  • [last lines]

    Christ: All authority in heaven and earth has been given to me. Make disciples of all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father, Son and Holy ghost teaching them to obey all the commandments I have given you. Behold, I am with you always, unto the end of the world.

Contact Us

The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Dogesflix's opinion. If the content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem within 5 workdays after receiving your email. If you find any instances of plagiarism from our website, please send an email to: and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 2 working days.

Recommend Articles