To Be or Not to Be evaluation action
-
Cordelia 2022-01-18 08:02:26
It's much more interesting than those films written and directed by Brooks. Of course, this is Liu Bieqian's foundation. It’s reluctant to take on those stage singing and dancing performances with Brooks' skill, but he played an atypical jealous husband very well. He was eager to hear his wife and young officers have an ambiguity, but when something really happened, he still bite the bullet and pretend to be Hitler. , His sense of responsibility for his wife, performance, and the country are combined, jealousy is just a minor tune, which makes the role hierarchical and clear, not unpleasant. The comedy design uses a lot of back and forth echoes and repetitions. At the end of the curtain call, Bancroft’s name was still laughing at me in parentheses. Colonel Gestapo’s small movements are also very delicate-put Bancroft’s hand on his thigh. It’s hard to be on the table and short legs, but it’s boring to be slapped in the face right away with the flag. For example, when Brooks said he wants to defend the property, domestic directors such as Han Hante like this routine, which is good for the film. Not much. Some of the designs surrounding their performances are very clever. The jokes of peace and piece, and the use of hexagrams to save the scene when the Jewish dragon is exposed... It’s a pity that I forgot the old version.
-
Else 2022-01-18 08:02:26
Bronsky: Do you know her husband Bronsky? Gestapo: I saw it on the stage in Warsaw, before the war. Yes, let me tell you about his performance. Bronsky: Oh good. Gestapo: He ruined Hamlet like that, and we treated Poland like that.
-
Frederick Bronski: It's a, it's a, it's a RAT hole.
-
Nazi officer: You are sitting in Col. Erhardt's chair.
Anna Bronksi: Oh, how silly of me. Ten minutes ago it was my chair.