Wildlife evaluation action
-
Krista 2022-03-25 09:01:22
From saving children to saving parents. The story is not bad, and the pictures are beautiful. The downside is that the characters are a bit facialized. I mean the couple. The rich man's character is set more deeply, so the director mocked the poor unreservedly when he was just starting out. Stupid, reckless, short-sighted, whimsical, irresponsible, immature, in this film almost equated with poverty, the director is a ruthless man (when he was an actor, he played very challenging roles, Should be very ambitious, looking forward to his future development).
-
Cindy 2022-03-26 09:01:14
Let's face facts. There is no wildness in the wilderness of life, only the fire that burns down the home and the life that is broken at a touch. The difference is that some people see value in the bright fire, and some people see madness in the pursuit of value. Dano not only found a precocious and sensitive young actor like him for his debut film, but also picked a good script. There are obvious critiques of capitalism and the American Dream in the original, but they're all packed into a moving family story. So, What's going to happen to us? The little Witnesses, caught between their parents, could neither ask answers nor make choices. But there seems to be no need to make a choice, because in the end he learned how to make "Wild Life" history in this modern American history.
-
Warren Miller: You should always say nice things to women especially your mother.
-
Warren Miller: I learned everything that meant anything in the army.