Long and Short Commentary on Sorkin's Style

Thaddeus 2022-04-23 07:01:59

(5.0) In the past, I could only say that I didn't like Sorkin's participation in the screenplay very much, and now I can say that I don't even like the director. The peculiar dialogue lasts for a while and then fails, and the wonderful words become dull with the passage of time. The director's job should be to neutralize the extreme screenwriters, or to find a reasonable image presentation method for the extreme screenwriters. Sorkin was trapped in his own goodness, unable to extricate himself, and the lack of experience eventually made the story out of control and his goodness was worthless in the end. There are some people who have turned to photography and become directors fortunately because they do not understand the script and choose a stable and mature story with an understanding of the image, but it is easier to succeed. In contrast to contemporary Sorkins, the high-intensity dialogue of the Golden Age or earlier (represented by comedies of all kinds) was not only a feature but a means, creating interesting characters in a witty film, and more Importantly, these roles carry corresponding moral responsibilities. Now, this feature is still a tool, but it is more like a tool for dazzling skills. A few jokes are shaken out of the overall tone, and what comes out of this joke is the role positioning that is hard to figure out. Sorkin's representatives, Zuckerberg, Jobs, and Molly Bloom are often known as social elites to attract audiences. I think the label of "the troublemakers of human society" is more appropriate, because these characters are completely stripped of moral responsibility. . The turbulent and purposeless life may be real, but it should not be stopped by "movies". What she is looking for is meaning and certainty, even if this certainty is called "life is impermanent". Maybe it's because the characters are too contemporary and inconclusive? In this sense, these "elites" are farther from us than fantasy heroes like Iron Man and Spider-Man, and even a little bit further than Schneider's Superman. Let's give Sorkin a good director. We've all seen the energy of that model.

View more about Molly's Game reviews

Extended Reading
  • Hollis 2021-11-23 08:01:11

    The biography itself has a strong story, a good adaptation, and a good film rhythm. Unconsciously associate "Mrs. Sloan", the heroine is equally smart and strong, makes small mistakes but is kind and righteous in nature, and also relies on drugs. The heroine's background personality is too similar, the first time I saw it was amazing, the second time I was meh. The casino plays are shaped very rhythmically, and the courts are just so mediocre and too dramatic. However, unlike "S", the director's focus is not on comebacks. #Zurich film festival#

  • Rigoberto 2021-11-23 08:01:11

    I hate the ending, my father's line is terrible, and I have to give Molly a catharsis, which is a bit of forced chicken soup. The high-speed narrative dialogue in the first two hours is still very cool, but there is no beginning and end without "Jobs". However, there are some points that are too fast and I really can’t think normally. Can those financial and fraud knowledge speak slower? Or speak less.

Molly's Game quotes

  • Molly Bloom: You know what makes you feel okay about losing? Winning.

  • Judge Foxman: This courthouse is located within spitting distance of Wall Street. I know this from my personal experience trying to spit at it. The men and women who work there will commit more serious crimes by lunchtime today than the defendant has committed in this indictment.