Okay, the content is the origin of hellboy's story, and from the end, it is the rhythm of the sequel. The protagonist is a big stupid guy throughout, the female protagonist is a heavy-mouthed black man, the second male is a Korean leopard, and there is a big stupid dad. There are a lot of rough and bloody ugly scenes, and the villain's image affects eating popcorn. appetite. As a child of the offspring of King Arthur who copulated with the devil, I think the plot of the account is still very bizarre, neither serious nor bitter in the past. The transformation of the Korean leopard highlights the lack of funding for CGI. Because I haven't read the comics, I don't know how many plots are from the original work. I always feel that it is very strange to have Merry appear twice. Why let Hellboy take the sword, and then let him take the sword after the blood? The things are the same to a certain extent. Hellboy has been acting like a spoiled child in the middle. Logically, the timelines of the two characters' plot advancement coincide with Hellboy holding the sword, but the result of Hellboy's choice is different, either destroying the world or cutting it. The Queen of Dead Blood dropped her sword again. . . Rather than a story about The Rise of the Blood Queen, it's Hellboy: The Original Avengers...
View more about Hellboy reviews
