Each character in the film has its own way and standard for distinguishing right from wrong and resolving grievances. In our opinion, everyone's ideas are very common. However, these standards are what we can rely on in the environment where we live and grow together. Standard? Christian and his tablemate retaliated against school bullying through counterattacks and threats, and the audience enjoyed watching it; the doctor was slapped in public in front of the children without revenge, and vented through swimming, and the audience felt very angry; Christian was revengeful Sheng, find the work place and vehicle of the assailant, and hope that the doctor will take the initiative to find out what he wants to say. The audience also feels it is right, but it is unreasonable. Christian prepares to take revenge by himself. The plot of detonating the bomb has become the climax of the conflict in the film. , the heart really came to the throat at once; when the partner's parents were worried about the child's life, and the mother even wanted to strangle Christian, the anger that the mother's pain transformed into is also understood by people. Christian thought that It is also a normal solution for the partner’s death to jump off the building to express his guilt. The partner’s father rushed to the top of the building in time to rescue Christian, who was about to jump off the building. Occupational instinct saves the dying and heals the wounded, disregarding the opposition of the common people, and healing the big man who is hated by thousands of people and doing all kinds of evil. This is a rational standard. When the big man's abusive words angered the doctor, his inner anger broke the bottom line of the profession, and he would have been cured. The big man was dragged out of the medical tent and allowed to be beaten to death by the public. Here is a close-up of the doctor. I think the doctor who is sober at the moment must regret it. The bottom line of professional ethics: Since the big man has been cured based on duty rather than friendship, this has successfully created a rare image of a rational stalwart, but he has voluntarily abandoned him and let him be beaten to death, then, "Why did I save him in the first place? ?" If you can't follow the guidelines from the beginning to the end, all previous efforts will be ruined, and what is the purpose of this in the end!), after this bloody ideological struggle, the doctor finally learned to transcend Personal psychological sensibility, making rational decisions. Following the subjective likes and dislikes all the way is really happy in my heart, and I go straight to the big pit without turning around and let it develop, resulting in the result that the enemy is happy and the relative is painful, but the practice of "worrying fire" will not lead things astray. Regardless of whether children or adults, this film shows the subjective side of self, and at the same time, returns to the social order in the end. This is the strong spiritual theme implied in this film:
If after these things, everyone understands and learns to use the law, the common criterion of society, to face contradictions and think about problems, instead of judging right from wrong and seeking "justice" through their own emotional likes and dislikes, then this will would be a better world.
View more about In a Better World reviews
