BUG1: The female deceased was dead, her head was bleeding, as if she was attacked by someone, but it was later proved that it was caused by the person crashing into the washstand after fainting. This can be judged by on-site inspection. Why did the police still take the novelist away? (hereinafter referred to as the male lead)? Since it can be said clearly, the male protagonist has to run away, which is unreasonable. After seeing half of it, you can judge the real murderer.
2. Since it was a heart attack, why didn't you check the cause? Forensics are very responsible.
3. The male protagonist said that the male deceased was killed at the beginning and locked in the room. After he was knocked out by the lover, the lover and the mistress moved the male deceased out, which means that the living room was not the first scene, there was blood in the room. Wait for traces, why didn't they search? Moreover, the male protagonist claimed to be knocked unconscious, and the scars have not been examined.
4. Since the father of the little girl is going to sue the male protagonist, why can the male protagonist leave the country?
5. At the end, the male protagonist sits on the plane and rubs his feet, implying to change his shoes. Why didn't the forensic doctor find out?
6. The police determined that the male protagonist was innocent and the mistress was the real culprit, that is, the soles of the male deceased's shoes were free of mud. In fact, this was not the key evidence, and it was too hasty to let people go.
7. Is it too much for the male protagonist to tell the police the truth before the plane takes off? Aren't you afraid that the plane will be delayed and the police have a recording?
To sum up, this film is both a suspense film, and these bugs may also be deliberately made by the film, which is a spit on Indian society. The first person to guess the truth was the policeman who was wretched in appearance and could sleep when arresting people.
View more about Ittefaq reviews
