Public power must use civilized means to deal with animals, not animal means

Rashawn 2022-01-28 08:33:44

After watching this video. One of the insights is: public power must use civilized means to deal with animals, instead of righteous indignation against animals. If that happens, then public power will become beasts.

In the film, the innocent teenage victim is in a painful psychological struggle or undergoing a painful operation. The scene changes to a more comfortable interrogation room, but the murderer is sitting there eating pizza, drinking Coke, and asserting that his finger Due to being splattered and scratched by fragments of the victim's skull, it should be treated. The lawyer had no choice but to be "professional and decent" and embarrassed to remind Jingcha that "my client should rest", "my client should take care of the wound", etc. Jingcha also came up and put a band-aid on the wound. . The murderer was also very perverted "elegant", "polite (cultured)" and said thank you. Yes, the psychological impact of this contrast on the audience, any person with a conscience will be angry and itchy, wishing he could rush to tear this beast to pieces. But sorry, private rights, whatever you do is OK. But public power, we can't be like Yemen, we can't use a stone to kill the young girl between the walls, we can only shoot or inject. Although I absolutely agree with stoned to death (but, what if this person is wronged? Yes, here, the strange argument of wronged and not wronged is still discussed, because its influence on the psychology of spectators is not the same) but The advanced ones of those civilized countries are not discussed here. Only discuss the matter itself. Personally, I advocate heavy punishment, but after reading the case of one of the five Nordic countries in the most advanced region in human history, my thinking is: each has its own advantages and disadvantages. Perhaps, all we can do is describe the facts

View more about 22 July reviews

Extended Reading
  • Melyna 2022-03-24 09:03:45

    Very standard green grass, but in this type of subject, I always feel that Peterberg is slightly better. Green Grass is very ambitious, and began to strive to restore more events, but the more the movie goes on, the more the audience pays attention to the opposition between the two individuals, and the rest are all taken away.

  • Godfrey 2022-03-14 14:12:31

    Political films have lost the initiative in the text until today. The single dominant emotion and the passive parallelism driven by the current situation will inevitably lead to a lag in creation, and there are many outdated and clichés (such as the one in Berlin this year). Fortunately, we have green grass. , using photography to accuse, and editing to fight, the film is no longer a stand-in for catharsis, but a sincere medium to realize the transmission of appeals by virtue of the self-instinctive attributes of images.

22 July quotes

  • Geir Lippestad: You can't call the Prime Minister. And Norway isn't on trial. You are.

    Anders Behring Breivik: Are you sure about that?

  • Anders Behring Breivik: I'd do it all again if I could.

    Geir Lippestad: You didn't win, Anders. You failed.

    Anders Behring Breivik: There will be others to finish what I've started.

    Geir Lippestad: And we will beat you. My children and their children. They will beat you.