Guns and the media, these two seem to have nothing in common, but they both become murder weapons in the film.
The former, pierces the human body, making people dripping with blood; the latter, destroys the human soul, making people physically and mentally exhausted.
A gun-wielding person, even if it is a momentary mistake, will be regarded as a murderer by many people, and he is caught in a dilemma; a media person, after killing someone without blood, can still stand in front of others in neat clothes, and then turn his face into a righteous side. Exciting text.
The gunman still feels guilty and sad after hurting someone; media people, when the protagonist is overwhelmed and despairing of giving up his life, few people mourn and worry about the deceased, they are more concerned about whether they can grab to the headline.
Look at the children, who can laugh and talk freely in the museum with the "robbers", but when they step out of the museum, they are horrified by the oncoming guns and dazzling lights ...
whether it is intentional or not. Inadvertently, even if the person wounded with a gun chooses to survive, he will not be able to escape legal prosecution after all; on the other hand, the media pushes the protagonist to a desperate situation, but does not need to bear any responsibility.
By no means is it to say that guns are harmless, but the murderousness of the media and the moral bottom line of people in the media really make people shudder.
View more about Mad City reviews
